I agree. There was supposed to be a possible false flag in October, according to her. Fair warning is nice, but I wonder if someone is gaming her. IMO, she should stick to what provably happened, rather than interpreting tea leaves of sources. There's already enough in the past clearly indicating the future. It's harmful to her credibility. At least she should much more clearly separate the "predictions" with a grain of source caveat.

I don't see the trust being built. I agree with her this is a controlled demolition of the electoral process. I'm surprised Homeland Security hasn't been brought up more considering they were to take over the elections. Perhaps that's the next step in a more open draconian way.