Medical journal editor of twenty years says scientific journals can no longer be trusted

submitted by chottohen from files.catbox.moe

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alphix 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

That looks like a Jew. When a Jew speaks, you always have to check the angles.

[–]YoMamma 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know that doesn't make sense.

[–]tomatopotato 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Okay, which angle do you suggest we start with?

[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Let's start with the one where research papers were all perfectly good until we got vaccine injury galore and now research papers are worthless. Interesting cohencidence.

[–]YoMamma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not how one studies research papers.

[–]Rah 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It started way way earlier than 14 years ago

[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I know this. I know this extremely well. What I question is WHY are we hearing about this NOW?

Let me give you an example: in the 1950s, Ancel Keys made a HYPOTHESIS about animal fat being a cause of heart disease. What did he have to defend it with? A big mouth and a politician's instincts. It was all bullshit, we know that now. But it's been 70 years and most people still believe that bullshit HYPOTHESIS story.

Bad science is nothing new. So why now? Now that we have massive numbers of reports of vaccine injuries?

[–]YoMamma 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

For 70 years it's been COMMON knowledge that animal fats cause heart disease (because it raises "bad" cholesterol).

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]Rah 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I may know why; the vax manufacturers already have the technology for safer adjuvants, but were holding to it for decades. You may hear in a close future talks about replacing the aluminium oxide with phosphates for a safer immune response.

And indeed it is, but there is just so much junk in them that it might not matter and they are just buying time for the next hustle.

[–]tomatopotato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think anything changed tbh. The research papers backed by pharma were always seen as perfectly basically good by the general public. It's just that more people realize they were always worthless this time, due in large part to the authorities overplaying their hand. Also, it's harder to memory-hole stuff in the internet age.