POV: you're a childless mid-30s woman focusing on your career. Imagine choosing this over a husband and children.

submitted by Chipit from (files.catbox.moe)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

There's a name for the logical fallacy you just used, but I can't recall it at the moment.

I'm more than a little surprised at all the people who were triggered by this post and came out of the woodwork to defend sterility. But that's the reality of paid posters on the internet these days.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's a name for the logical fallacy you just used, but I can't recall it at the moment.

/head-desk

Its the naturalistic fallacy, and it's not me that fell for it. It's the foolish idea that just because something is "natural" it must be good.

There are some natural things which are good, some are conditionally good, some are neutral, and many are bad.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Having children is not bad. It's good.

No fallacy here.

Are you a mid-30s unmarried childless woman who has hit the wall? I'm more than a little surprised at something this uncontroversial being pushed back against so hard. The thing to do now is embrace being a wine aunt and be a cautionary example to your nieces.