you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. I just complained that there are certain people that seemingly always are ignored just because they are seldom (because of how genetics work).

There are 16 people in this picture and redheads (after my latest info) make about 1 % of the general population (in Europe). So statistically it is outside the margin of error which implies intention when looking at the dublettes of stereotypes in this picture.

Do we really need two black women with almost the same hairstyle in this picture?

Do we need the bald guy that looks like a polished lollipop ?

Do we need the guy not able to point his hand like all others do ?

Do we need the two gay guys in the upper right ?

Do we need the cross-eyed asian chick ?

So many children also isn't quite representative when looking at the age distribution in almost all "western" countries.

They gotta set their priorities better.

[–]peety 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

why are you complaining about it? is there some need to find something so innocuous and tear it apart? do you really think it was necessary to find a person of every type and race to make a picture? why can't you just accept the message it sends?you don't like the butterfly nets? why are there so many butterfly nets?

is your psyche so fragile that a picture upsets you so much?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How serious did i mean this comment ? What do you think ?

Take a guess.

Edit: But please stop making guesses about my psyche. Whole other calibres of "specialists" failed in this endeavour.