you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

But there are no paths to solutions in many of those responses.

Mentioning that path is against the rules on saidit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Perhaps you're joking....

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

Hmm, not explicitly mentioned on that page, but M7 has repeatedly said 'that path' can't be advocated on saidit.

BTW, read though those comments if you haven't already. Note the "I'm a pedophile" guy, and many others like him.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I probably misunderstand what "the path" is, in this context. If you can define what you mean by "the path", perhaps I'll understand (though this is now rather late in the conversation and you may be now engaged in other matters). It's good to read that there is some more information on the recent ban of Muskrat, but I wish he wouldn't share additional evidence about Bob's screenshot, as this shows evidence of his support of Bob - as if he were spamming the conversation with Bob's comments. Thus he got cought-up in a Bob discussion, and loki88 fake account and spam process, that made him look like he was part of the coordination of those approaches to insult Amelia and cause other problems. It seems he had shown his agreement with Bob's concerns, and loki88's fake accounts created additional character assassination that pointed fingers at Muskrat. Even Amelia agreed with me that Muskrat might have been caught up in a case of mistaken identity. But now (new) Muskrat is adding fuel to the fire, again, though may or may not know it. If he notes Bob is the PM source of the screenshot, then this calls into question the context in which Muskrat shared it, as that context got him in trouble.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://saidit.net/s/funny/comments/7ob5/this_is_ridiculous/sw1u

Here is my hopefully last comment on all that. It's unfortunate that our troll is able to play the situation here so successfully...

Bob is a girl, btw.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for this. I agree, "Musky and bob got a bad deal".

Because the trolls got involved, I think M & B unwittingly got cought-up in fake screenshots and arguments that were critical of M7.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

See Larry's reply to my comment. Much better formatted explanation than mine.