Socialims is Communism Lite.

Yes.

They both make the exact same claim: that the poor will be made wealthier by giving more power to the government and trusting that the government will give them back more benefits in return.

I can agree with that.

That doesn't make one ounce of sense.

Yet you don't refute the actual point. If they count food insecure as "getting government benefits" and the government doesn't give benefits to everyone who needs them: the amount of people who are actually food insecure must be higher than those counted as such.

People who eat junk food could spend less on healthy food

I have yet to see healthy food sold at a lower price than junk food. Perhaps that's true in Yankeedom, but not where I live.

they would have to know what is healthy food

Another problem with Capitalism: businesses are incentivized to lie about what they sell, so they need to be forced to label their products.

some ability to cook.

Food that you cook on an actual stove tends to be of a much higher price than microwaved food, and especially junk food — again: perhaps it's different in Yankeedom, but not where I live.

Your point is a lie

Yet you refuse to give a counter-point.

You clearly don't understand what a strawman is.

You clearly don't, because you're the one arguing against things I didn't say, and then pretending like I was saying them — that's what a strawman is. You do this because you've realized you can't actually refute any of my points.