you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dissidentrhetoric 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Junk science is actually a real term, look it up.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I know. Junk science = bad science. It doesn't carry the malevolence of "corruption" though. People need to know WHY and HOW the science got to be junk and dangerous on purpose.

[–]dissidentrhetoric 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I know.

That article doesn't even mention corruption. It intentionally uses softer clinical words like: spurious, fraudulent, and pejorative

Corruption brings excessive greed, rotten to the core, and death, war, and famine - painfully drawn out in agonizing suffering - affecting real lives that matter in the MILLIONS or BILLIONS.

I wish there was a better term than "junk science" or "corrupt science". "Exploitative shit science for epic profits, global intense suffering, and psychopathic global-cidal eugenics" doesn't roll off the tongue.