People will hoard your currency which is feeding their greed and other sins , if you put anonymity as a protecting veil in it. So you gotta mitigate this problem, by making the hoarding very hard in a timely sense that means putting a negative exponent in the equation that defines the "growth"-direction of the money or inflation /deflation as a given starting direction / constraint. If you can hold people accountable for "bad" hoarding by putting anonymity out of this system, you can go after the people doing this quickly enough, because the positive "growth" (it is only virtual, because you can't generate worth exponentially only in a O( n^x ), or polynomial sense) generates enough overflow money for it. But you put in the old might and hierarchy-questions there also again.

And i don't like hierarchies, that we all know failed so often. Its either a meritocracy or plutocracy at some time point then again. But you can mitigate this one, by tightening other screws and putting some sand in that gearbox that defines the hierarchies of the whole new system. How corruption can be defined better to be solved is the real brain bomb for me, if you choose the old direction. Another question for me is: where you loose more energy, so more or less which direction to choose here is better.