Climate change made 2023 Amazon drought 30 times more likely, scientists say

submitted by ActuallyNot from (news.mongabay.com)

all 21 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]P-38lightning 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"The vaccine is safe and effective."

Scientists say.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. They do say "A very rare serious adverse event is myocarditis," wrt to BNT162b2.

But the summary is correctly "The vaccine is safe and effective."

[–]Rah 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Climate has always changed. Bizarre events are bizarre. Statistics supporting men-made climate change are not accurate and are always misleading.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Yes. This would be "man made climate change" as the governments of South America are allowing their forests to be destroyed. But this article is oversimplify the cause and effect, as it is both catalytic and localized.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

This would be "man made climate change" as the governments of South America are allowing their forests to be destroyed.

No. Global warming.

But this article is oversimplify the cause and effect, as it is both catalytic and localized.

Link to your source of information if you haven't just pulled this out of your ass.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Source.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you pulled out of our your ass.

That's what we've come to expect from you.

Spreading lies and deceit.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What you should expect from me, is to not play your games. As anyone """engaging""" with you, will find themselves arguing until the heat death of the universe and getting nowhere. You virtue signal like a bitch. And it's disgusting.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

No it didn't

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

And yet the evidence shows it was.

Who to believe? A comprehensive study by scientists, or only one man on saidit, known for not understanding climate change?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

the evidence

There is no evidence. People are trusting garbage simulations and forming opinions and policy on the results like retards. This is fear porn for the faithful, no less.

[–]HOBO-ROBOT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no evidence. People are trusting garbage simulations and forming opinions and policy on the results like retards. This is fear porn for the faithful, no less.

did adolph hitler say anything about wanting to kill jews in his book "mein kampf"?

ChatGPT Yes, Adolf Hitler did express his anti-Semitic views in his book "Mein Kampf" ("My Struggle"). In the book, he outlined his belief in the superiority of the Aryan race and expressed his hatred towards Jews, whom he blamed for various societal problems in Germany. While he did not explicitly state his intentions to kill Jews in "Mein Kampf," he laid the ideological groundwork for the Holocaust and the genocide of six million Jews during the Holocaust. Hitler's anti-Semitic rhetoric in "Mein Kampf" contributed to the propagation of the Nazi ideology that ultimately led to the implementation of the Final Solution during World War II.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Ahh.

So are you ignorant of how good the simulations are?

Or do you not care, and are repeating the lies about how good the science is because you've seen the Trolls from Olgino, do that on other forums, and now you feel that that opinion is that of your political in group?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I don't understand the simulations are garbage

I know, comrade. It shows in your comments.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Here's an educational read for you, my poor ignorant tovarishch: Analysis: How well have climate models projected global warming?

I know the denialosphere keeps pushing the misinformation that models are useless. But it turns out they've been spot on the nose since the 1980s.

And I'm sorry to disillusion you about whether those fossil fuel companies had your best information or their profits at heart ... But it was pretty fucking obvious.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

carbonbrief ignores history

many such cases

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The article looks at the history of climate modelling.

Read it.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The history of climate modelling is 100% GIGO, i already know about it

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The history of climate modelling is 100% GIGO, i already know about it

And here we see yet another example of someone who knows nothing about it repeating the lies from industry.

If you can't understand enough high school physics to know that increasing the concentration of greenhouse gasses increases the greenhouse effect, at least follow the money.

The article shows how well predictions from various models performed.

Read it.