A trash heap 62 meters high shows the scale of India's climate challenge

submitted by [deleted] from (cnn.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

OH look, you are highlighting a single random meaningless point from the article,

No the part of the article that the headline is based on, and that you didn't get in your comment: "Environmentalism is not the same thing as climate change. That's just a huge pile of garbage. Claiming it represent anything other than filth is a lie."

Now that I've taken my time to explain why this is related to climate change, by simply reading the fucking article, you will now feel much better informed.

I'm not going to debate it, because there's nothing more to be said, and you're welcome.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Right. Because I'm talking about the WEF banking cartel, and you are quoting Main Stream Media as facts. You are Not the Player Character.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Because I'm talking about the WEF banking cartel

Are you.

The article is about methane emissions from landfill in India.

and you are quoting Main Stream Media as facts.

No. Just the same fucking article you are commenting on.

You are not the player character.

What the fuck do you possibly mean to convey with that sentence?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Are you.

The article is about

Congratulations. You now recognized the difference between me and the article.

What the fuck do you possibly mean to convey with that sentence?

Bit slow aren't we?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Congratulations. You now recognized the difference between me and the article.

This started with a comment you posted which showed that you hadn't even read the article. I have no problem telling the difference.

Bit slow aren't we?

Either that or you're posting meaningless dribble. I tend to suspect that latter, as you don't have a history in this thread or others of leaning too hard on reality for support.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You are Not the Player Character.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Yeah you said that.

And we've already agreed it's meaningless dribble.

Have you got anything to add about the fact that landfill does, in fact, produce methane?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Man. There is slow and then there is you N.P.C.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Man. Your sticking to the meaningless dribble.

Have you got anything to add about the fact that landfill does, in fact, produce methane?