you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I have not researched this topic before, but to my knowledge, at least in ancient Greece, poetry was a very social activity. There were many travelling artists and performers, who would recite all sorts of poems at festivals and public events. In all likelihood, ancient Greek youth were familiar with a very great number of poems, and depending on the region and the performer, they probably heard different versions of those same poems too.

It's just like Skyrim!

It should be noted that at the time poetry also had spiritual connotations, so it wasn't a purely secular activity in the sense that we are familiar with.

According to Sallustius or Salutius depending on who you believe lol

"Theological myths suit philosophers, physical and psychic suit poets, mixed suit religious initiations, since every initiation aims at uniting us with the world and the Gods."

the Romans did not hold poetry to the same esteem as the Greeks

He was a Roman Neoplatonist and mentioned poets so I assume poets were still quite widespread then, I have no knowledge of it though.

I can't really comment on non-Greek, pagan Indo-European societies. I know too little about their relationship with poetry. To my knowledge, the Romans did not hold poetry to the same esteem as the Greeks. There are also some war or adventure related Germanic poems that I am sure you are familiar with, such as Beowulf and the Heliand, the latter of which we have discussed before. There is the Edda as well, which may perhaps be of interest to you - looking into the Edda and related subjects might possibly be illuminating. I don't really know much about the Edda, so I can't comment. Unfortunately, there is very little information about pagan Russia, but you might be interested in their bogatyr poems - unlike pagan mythological poetry, they do not feature supernatural elements, which I assume is due to the fact that they were compiled and put to writing after Russia was Christianised.

Going back to the Greeks, the Odyssey and the Illiad are probably the most major and influential poems you could read, if you are interested in works that had a very formative effect on Greek life, culture, and even politics.

Yeah I have the Iliad and Odyssey, and the Poetic Edda (not the Prose one though, or the Icelandic Sagas or anything else yet). I'll get Beowulf, the Heliand, the Gita and Epic of Gilgamesh eventually too. Bogatyr stuff seems interesting too, I'll look into them more.

[–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Theological myths suit philosophers, physical and psychic suit poets, mixed suit religious initiations, since every initiation aims at uniting us with the world and the Gods."

That sounds reasonable to me. Evola describes a similar dynamic with traditional structures - for example, a medieval knight would have his own experiences in different fields like religion, war etc. but by becoming associated with a traditional organisation, for example the Templars, all of his experiences become integrated in the name of a high cause, so instead of just living or just fighting, there is living for God, fighting for God, etc. The ability to remain loyal to this life of the heights is the proof of overcoming the human condition. The starting point is material being, which is then united with the transcendent factor (or spiritual being if you prefer), and then eventually the former is completely overcome and subordinated by the latter.

The website you've linked also makes another mention of the divine nature of myth and poetry in the second paragraph of section three. In relation to that, it might be worth mentioning Evola's view on the meaning of myth - the way I understand it, for him myth is essentially a superhistorical, metaphysical narrative. Instead of myth being 'primitive history', as many people are accustomed to think, myth is in fact above history, because it is an ordered, intellectualised, spiritual narrative which is imposed on the world and on mere history, which are material by nature, and are incapable of representing any higher spiritual horizons in and of themselves.

He was a Roman Neoplatonist and mentioned poets so I assume poets were still quite widespread then, I have no knowledge of it though.

Roman Neoplatonism belongs to a far later period than what I was thinking of, but I was more so referring to the popular, social level anyway. I imagine poets would have been popular with the Roman aristocracy, the wealthy, and also with higher class youth, at least. I am not sure if they had the same social poetic traditions as the Greeks though. The class of the common soldiers for example are not known for their aesthetic interests. I know very little about the Roman attitudes to poetry, so the topic might be worth investigating further.

Yeah I have the Iliad and Odyssey, and the Poetic Edda (not the Prose one though, or the Icelandic Sagas or anything else yet). I'll get Beowulf, the Heliand, the Gita and Epic of Gilgamesh eventually too. Bogatyr stuff seems interesting too, I'll look into them more.

The Gita is a bit more on the philosophical side, but it is probably my favourite text. It has a certain charge to it, if that makes sense. Occasionally, there is some difficult terminology in it, though.