The US Supreme court has overturned Roe vs Wade - Thoughts?

submitted by Nasser from (self.debatealtright)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10950109/Supreme-Court-OVERRULES-Roe-v-Wade-saying-Constitution-does-not-confer-right-abortion.html

Is this a self own for Republicans? Will there be 2020 style riots? What will be the demographic consequences?

all 31 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

[1]

[2]

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The alt right should always ask, "who benefits?" This ruling will erase potential gains in right wing congressional seats. It will increase non white birth rates. It will likely lead to another round of riots where blacks take advantage of chaos, destroy cities and destroy local police forces.

  • major cities burning
  • more leftist power
  • economic depression accelerating
  • women moving more radical left wing
  • white women and white men politically divided
  • entire country losing focus on inflation and impending shortages

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

To add:

  • Republicans losing ground in an election that they would have otherwise won in a landslide

Cant let republicans win too big b/c then they might actually be expected to do something (besides gove money to Israel)

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Check this out:

https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1656092524322.jpg

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah lol saw that. So much for the " no calls to violence" rule, i guess

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is guns and encouraging the trapping and neutering of CIS men a call to violence? Weird how all these rules went out the window so quickly.

https://i.ibb.co/160LZCb/Screenshot-20220624-204843-Reddit.jpg

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fact that the entire Jewish system fanatically supports abortion tells us that they benefit from it.

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly, we all know who benefits, its the same fucking group that always benefits. The same group that is obsessed with machiavellian manipulation and controlling opposition and using it for their own ends. Republicans dont take a shit unless it's vetted by this group, who have remade the party with their vast wealth and media power and who will destroy the political career of anyone who opposes them, their latest scalp being Madison Cawthorne, who was popular with his constituency and yet was still primaried and replaced with some dumb fucking conservatard INC boomer.

[–]douglas_waltersWhite Supremacist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do you believe in a political solution?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you call balkanizing the country a political solution yes.

[–]curious2 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Seems inconsistent

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because "owning the libs" and "libtears" are what is important to many. There is a reason this is an issue conservatives are allowed to be "radical" on.

[–]lolikon69 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This place has too many christcuckservatives.

[–]MagicMike 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

60% of abortions involve POC, so your point is valid.

[–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So why are so many of you,

There isn't strong support for restricting abortions in spaces like these.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Idk. I would have left the abortion. Honestly, one of the few eugenics laws we were able to keep.

[–]Dashing-Dove 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

White, non-Hispanic women have the lowest abortion rate of all ethnicities, and roughly 850k occur per year in the US, so there will be demographic consequences. The majority of pregnant women will likely cross state lines or secure an illegal abortion, but I expect that a significant minority won't, especially among poorer communities. The result will be a minor to moderate increase in non-White births, as well as crime rates, since legalized abortion is correlated with a 20% reduction in crime.

I don't believe any child should be forcibly born unwanted, and there are many historical precedents for the acceptance of abortion in European civilization, from the glory days of Greece and Rome all the way to colonial America. Hard-line stances against it are a result of modern Abrahamic religious influence mixed with black-and-white Republican moral idiocy. There is certainly nothing conservative about the practical impact of its ban.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm torn on this one. White feminist women scream "free abortion on demand" into loud speakers in Washington D.C. because they want unrestricted promiscuity, hypergamy, and giving women the legal ability to kill their boyfriend/husbands unborn child.

On the otherhand, when Lakeesha gets an abortion, she prevents a possible black killer from being born, who we will have to pay for to be incarcerated.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Another development: Thomas has hinted that other cases need overturned.

https://i.postimg.cc/ZKWpRvyX/1656081355325.jpg

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction.

.

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that sanctions of criminal punishment for those who commit sodomy are unconstitutional.[1][2] The Court reaffirmed the concept of a "right to privacy" that earlier cases, such as Roe v. Wade, had found the U.S. Constitution provides, even though it is not explicitly enumerated.[3] The Court based its ruling on the notions of personal autonomy to define one's own relationships and of American traditions of non-interference with private sexual decisions between consenting adults.[4]

.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fact President Kushner appointed a couple of these hardline catholic justices, and the others were appointed by Dubya, the 2nd most Jewish controlled president in history behind Biden(with Trump a close third), means Jewish power wanted this decision.

What the angle is I'm not sure. The obvious thinking is that they simply wanted to usher in permanent shitlib rule, as this ruling will help the Democrats substantially and put Republicans in a hopeless spot thanks to an emboldened evangelical base that will now expect them to get busy banning or severely restricting abortion in every state, something which will be political suicide in the long run.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Conservatard fake victory.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jesus smiles, Moloch seethes

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(((Jesus)))

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Saving 100k white babies>>> killing 500k niglets

[–]TheWorldToCome 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Doubt you're saving that many white babies, just cause the woman aborting is white doesn't mean the child she's aborting is

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, how many of them are being raised under Democrat/Republican families?

If Democrat Whites stop aborting, they now have someone to brainwash and start voting at age 18.

[–]AidsVictim69 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you think most of these white babies are going to grow up to be healthy right wing whites? Healthy intelligent whites rarely need abortions.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Saving 100k white babies>>> killing 500k niglets

Is it though? How many white people will be harmed by these 500k niglets? How much chaos and death will 500k would-be-aborted niglets cause, both directly and indirectly?

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's a great outcome. I'm hoping that this will finally bring out the kind of protests that I hoped the leak would bring out 1-2 months ago. I want the Far-Left RCP, PSL out there rioting; I want NARAL, which purports to have 2.5 million members, out there as well. I want abortionists to feel like they're in the Fourth Reich or Gilead they always think their surroundings are always on the edge of becoming. I want them anxious, depressed and drug-addled all day long. I want the pigs and these untermensch scum to clash non-stop. I want these subhuman shit-suckers to wail all day about how guns (wrongly) have more rights than they do and how America 'hates women'. Have you ever seen women being crushed by a steamroller like I've seen guns?

And, first and foremost, I want the masses to be convinced that the United States needs to split up.

I can't really figure out why someone would oppose it - unless they just hate abeeds more than they love Whites.

Some of the reasoning here also seems senseless. If the whole point of ending RvW was just to increase the number of abeeds and put an end to a supposedly eugenic measure... don't you think that RvW would have been ended a long time ago? It seems like many people here think that America was literally still practicing eugenics up until today?

Meanwhile, I'm enjoying the sheer ocean of soy-filled tears being cried out onto comment sections, and most of these comments are remarkably predictable as though created from a bot network or hive mind:

Handmaid's Tale, etc.

The handmaids tale gets closer to reality every single day.

The USA is becoming Gilead

Welcome to Gilead.

It turns out the Handmaids Tale is actually a documentary about current day USA.

One step closer to The Handmaids Tale becoming reality. What a backwards country they are.

The USA is becoming more like the "Handmaid's Tale" every day.

Muh 'guns have more rights than women' nonsense and other false equivalencies:

Yet you can buy an assault rifle to shoot school children.

America has now deemed a vagina more dangerous than a gun.

What is the difference between a gun and a woman in America? A gun has more rights.

Need to change their national anthem. Home of the brave and land of the free? Guns have more rights in the USA than actual women.

Guns have more rights than woman Disgusted

Land of the free but only if youre a man or a gun.

Horrific. Vile country where guns are more important than women.

The land of the free. Just not for women. Controlled by men and other people once again. A slap in the face for woman and girls. Shameful.

American men make all the rules. Love their guns, hate their women.

Wait... 'their women'? Isn't that sexist?

'Just In Case' (worst case scenario) fallacies, as though rapes and deformities are some kind of major occurrence. Furthermore, these same fucking worthless scum wouldn't dare support using abortion to rid humanity of the 00.01% intersex population, who could actually be feasibly eliminated before birth and thus rid us of a great deal of the argument for transsexualism:

Whether you agree with general abortion or not, is it fair to condemn a family to a life of looking after a severely deformed child that can never live a normal life of their own?

So a thirteen year old girl , who has been forced against her will, has to suffer giving birth, and then has to have the child adopted, due to her age, and who the father is, is obscene. There should always be special circumstances.

Pure nihilism and miscellaneous braindead comments:

If youre against abortion, dont get one. If youre against contraception, dont take any. If youre against same-sex relationships, dont have one. If youre against same-sex marriage, dont marry someone of same gender. Do not impose your beliefs & religion on all Americans.

It is for the woman alone to make the decision whether she has an abortion or not and her circumstances Not a supreme court what a load of idiots

Notice that none of these semi-literate morons would dare use this lame argument for guns, though? If you're against guns, just 'don't get one'?

This is nuts to be honest! The government should never dictate what anyone does with their own bodies!

Yeah, sure. Does the word 'vaccine' ring a bell?

Pity the ultra right don't worry about the rights of the child once born. The right to not be poor, the right to decent education the right to not have to worry out being shot at school. The right not have to rely on food stamps and not go hungry

None of these things are 'rights', ya' retarded nonce. Where in the world does anyone believe that people have a 'right' to anything beyond basic assembly, speech, etc.? Some Marxist cesspool that nobody wants to live in?

Basically, semi-literate, unintelligent morons are out in droves crying all over the internet today. And they're all on one side, which reminds me every single time of why it is right to be on the other.

[–]radcentristisafag 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Irrelevant, really.

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Future generations of white women will have to be more chaste instead of sluts.