you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So you’re adamantly anti-Covid conspiracy, but admit that it is coincidentally in line with their “interests?”

Saying they don’t debate because they are “largely right” is circular and presumes a position that can be respected only AFTER a thorough back and forth debate has been had. That hasn’t been done.

Short of that, if you were Judge Judy trying to hear both sides of a matter, and one party was continuously preventing the other party from being heard, what do you think she would do? She would grant default judgment against the suppressive party. You’re doing the opposite.

Also, by fixating on claims of FEMA camps and doomsday speculations, it reminds me of people who think all 9/11 truthers believe the planes were holograms. The “hysterical shit” is mostly the result of people having to take their persuasion tactics to the next level, because others (such as yourself?) flippantly dismiss the less sexy red flags. Like the obvious suppression of professional opposing viewpoints I’ve been talking about.

Again, I’m just curious as my username suggests. But I would think a responsible dissident would error on the side of not further normalizing trust and acquiescence to an authority that is already allegedly is trying to replace his people. But again, you’re doing the opposite.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you’re adamantly anti-Covid conspiracy, but admit that it is coincidentally in line with their “interests?”

Again, not having a virus running rampant through society and putting them in personal jeopardy while wrecking the economy they parasite off certainly is in their interests. In this particular case I would say it's in everyones interest not to have covid rippling through society uncontrolled, so it's a rare thing me and Jewish elites agree on.

But I would think a responsible dissident would error on the side of not further normalizing trust and acquiescence to an authority that is already allegedly is trying to replace his people. But again, you’re doing the opposite.

The problem is this, if you spread conspiracy theories that are demonstrably false and illogical, it will damage your credibility. Of course the elites will take advantage of ANY global event to increase their power, that goes without saying. That doesnt mean that every global event is part of a vast conspiracy they set in motion. If an asteroid took out 1/3 of the planet tomorrow, guess what, elites, in particular Jewish elites, would try to take advantage of the situation, that doesnt mean the asteroid hitting the earth was a Jewish plot.

Its important to blame them for the things they can be proven to cause, and trust me, theres a ton of shit that falls under that category. When you blame them for shit they arent really responsible for, you do more harm than good and they will use that to get a free pass and avoid scrutiny on shit they do. For instance I remember reading about Jewish media making a big deal out of some dimwitted black nationalists claiming Jews control the weather. Of course they then tried to lump in claims Jews control the media with the silly weather claims.

[–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No thoughts on judge Judy? Lol

Again, unless you’re fixated on the easy “hologram” side of the debate, I’m not sure how you’re jumping to Covid conspiracy being “demonstrably false and illogical” (especially when you’ve admitted to overlapping interests) in response to me pointing out the oddity of a dissident erring on the side of further normalizing mass trust and mass acquiescence to a group that he considers an enemy. I would think, even if there weren’t millions of adverse events reported, you’d advise against compliance for that reason alone.

Australia and Canada are still very much in Covid mode. Biden just renewed the emergency through July. I’m still not clear on why, if they don’t want the virus to run “rampant,” they don’t simply have a debate to convert a good number of skeptics.