Leftists respond to the "Don't Say Gay" bill

submitted by LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence from (self.debatealtright)

https://files.catbox.moe/572ejn.mp4

So, how do progtards react to the so-called 'Don't Say Gay' bill?

Well... simply by saying the 'naughty word', 'gay', over and over and over again. Rather like little children.

This is easily one of the most infantilized, immature responses I've ever seen to anything. What's more, the bill allegedly doesn't even have the word 'gay' in it anywhere whatsoever.

(Also posted at: https://communities.win/c/DebateAltRight/p/15HIckftV3/ )

all 18 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

They dont even know what it is. TV told them it's bad, so they are against it. It's like Ukraine. TV told them it's good, so they fly blue and yellow.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Spot on. They know 0% about the bill... but 100% about being gay. The consequence of identifying with their gender or sexuality before anything else.

Even then, I doubt that any of them can concretely recite the differences between each gender and sexuality, since new ones are being invented all the time.

They hilariously see it as an attack on themselves, even though the bill apparently also prevents all sorts of hetero things as well. Basically, it seems that you can't teach kids LGBTQIA+ crap or heteronormativity.

Of course, the gains made in wiping out the presence of LGBTQIA garbage are greater than the losses incurred in also wiping out the limited presence of what is already a practically non-existent heteronormativity along with it. But it isn't even what it's being summed up to be.

Firstly, it's literally one state, Florida.

Secondly, I suspect this graphic here is supposed to indicate that the bill only applies up till grade four. Where I am, that's when a person is around age ten. So it is possible that none of these protections really apply to most kids aged eleven years and over.

https://twitter.com/Monkey_D_Monke/status/1511826818684268547

The bill really looks like typical performative nonsense. It's the typical bone dropped to conservatives, not much different to Macron's government a few days ago banning a very small Antifa group that was particularly violent towards police. The message he intends to send to conservatives and to the police, who are known for inordinately supporting RN, is simple:

'Macron did this one little thing for us. That means that we don't need to shift Rightward to be tough on crime, because Macron really has our back'.

It's similar to the noise he made about American-imported 'wokeness', as if postmodernism isn't totally French, only to do nothing about it. And at around the same time that one of his ministers banned Generation Identity.

Take fifty bones away from them and then give them one back. Now the Right are being good dogs again!

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The gays know exactly what the new law is. That's why they branded it "don't say gay". It's the millions of straight leftists that ignorantly oppose it. I will repost my comment from another thread

The florida bill does still offer some protections above 3rd grade. It allows parents of any grade to sue for instruction that is not age appropriate for students. But I agree, it is still very weak.

What's even more disturbing is the left's reaction to it. Here we have an extremely soft and reasonable law that bans teaching kindergarteners about butt bandits and prevents teachers from encouraging them to chop their dicks off. This caused the j-left to go completely apeshit.

Why are they so opposed to this law? They want unconstrained access to your children. They want to turn as many people as they can into gender bended blue haired freaks, and the earlier they get started the more likely they are to succeed. Viacom and Disney have been leading the way on operation fagdrop for years.

If this were a rational nation that actually looked out for the interests of its citizens, investigators would hunt down the corporate fag pushers and make an example of them with a public trial followed by decades in prison. This would send a message to other propagandists and restore order, but instead, our country is doubling down on anal marriages and drag queen story hour.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Even then, I doubt that any of them can concretely recite the differences between each gender and sexuality

Only 2 genders exist, male and female. Multiple "sexualities" do not exist. Things like gay and lesbian are fetishes.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Macron can't really be compared to other Western centrist leaders. There's a reason why he's literally at the bottom of Zelensky's list.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

bottom of Zelensky's list.

What do you mean by this?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Macron is at the bottom of the list of Western leaders according to Zelensky.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Why does he oppose Macron? I don't know anything about him.

Edit: is macron a good guy or bad guy?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Because Macron wants to keep talking to Putin. France has a long history with Russian relations. Macron is also a kind of Jupiterian figure that has the balls to go to Africa and tell them they need to have less babies. Jews are suspicious of him.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I really dont like Zelensky. He's like some actor they made president to play president in real life. I guess when your government is play-pretend, it makes sense to have an actor as president. It's very similar to Trump.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I have seen a lot more than just "say gay" in response. Among the most popular reactions, I see things like "it's just teaching that queer people exist!" or "it technically does not allow teachers to speak about heretrosexual relationships!"

Lots of interesting responses to be analyzed. I however don't see much on side compared to that community as they always are able to debunk one thing or another. We have resources on race realism, statistics, JQ but coverage on LGBT studies on our side is paltry.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I think the theoretical foundation is lacking. A lot of the right-wing opposition is based on dogmatic Christianity. I am interested in developing a scientific understanding of the Homo Question. If anyone is looking for a place to start, I would recommend the book Faggots by Larry Kramer. It's been called a satire, but it has also been said that it's not at all an exaggeration.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Perhaps also that many of the scientifiic/sociological/logic-based arguments for homosexuality and transgenderism have only achieved widespread status in recent years, compared to the others that have been discussed for decades/centuries prior. A thread here would be a great place to start with a critical analysis.

I have another one. "Grooming" is a popular topic in this current round of debate. However LGBTs claim to not do so because they do not want to send anyone down a path of oppression. Of course, they believe such identities are natural and they are currently quite oppressed.

Thanks ofor the book recommendations. There is also the Transgender Industrial Complex which is a notable read as well.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Section 3

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good idea, but some would criticize these statistics as being biased, having poor sample sizes, or all products of a lack of social acceptance rather than inherent characteristics. The 1,000+ partners in particular has been rebuked; I wonder if there is an answer. https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Debunked:_gay_men_have_500-1000_partners

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am interested in developing a scientific understanding of the Homo Question.

I am interested in developing a solution to the homo question

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And even they've been trying to debunk the opposition to LGBT from a Christian perspective. The whole Arsenokoites/Leviticus/"Sodom & Gomorrah was inhospitality" debate.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This new law doesn't go far enough.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/U44XZcNixKY8/

LGBT propaganda shouldn't be allowed in schools, movies, TV shows, video games, etc at all.