you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Lugger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How would a nationalist movement encourage an increase in White birth rates?

Well, what many folks in nationalist circles don't understand is that times have changed, and people — both men and w*men — no longer want to have a lot of children for the sake of having children like they did in the past.

The modern world is too damn good of a place to live and enjoy, so it's really expected that Western Europeans aren't thrilled about sacrificing their 20s and 30s on raising children instead of, say, partying and pursuing Gender Studies degrees to secure a cushy job in some HuffPo-tier column so they can write about patriarchy and intersectionality while getting a paycheck and feeling good about themselves for the rest of their lives.

To get Europeans, especially whamen, to have children, the benefits of it should outweight the negatives by a far margin.

The most obvious way to achieve this is have the state provide good priveleges to couples with children — and they should be so good that the temptation will be hard to resist for most people.

Cutting the taxes in proportion to the number of children, low interest rate loans, handing out nice houses and apartments to the ones with a lot children, et cetera et cetera — you get the idea.

Yeah, many countries today offer some sort of privileges to the couples who have kids, but they're far too small to override the YOLO lifestyle.

Which is no surprise because the modern European elites think they can increase the population by importing hordes of Turd-World orcs from the Middle East, Africa and India. So why would they bother with raising the Europeans' birth rates?

The collapsing birthrates are in a lot of ways more than immigration the main driver of our people's ethnic replacement.

No, pal, you are wrong. You can't outbreed the Third World.

As a matter of fact, Japan's birth rates are extremely low as well, but they've no threat of being overrun by foreigners because their gubmint isn't nearly as retarded as the ones we have in the West.

A lot of factors are the cause from abortion, birth control...

...

To be honest, I've never understood why WN folks oppose these things. Boomers and Christcucks — yeah, but here?

I want people to have children they plan and desire, and if some whaman got knocked up by a Chad she banged on a ONS, it is in the interests of everyone — herself and the greater society — that she gets an abortion because she won't be able to provide for the child, and, since she didn't even want it in the first place, it will most likely experience abuse and grow up to be a lowlife thug or a junkie.

Who wants to have these people roaming around glorious Western European countries because the foids were unable to get an abortion due to 'muh child murder!!!' laws?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

rwers want women to be afraid to have sex with chad on a ONS lest she get pregnant and not be allowed to get an abortion and have to have a kid she didn't want. Women don't think ahead like that though, just live in the moment. So that does lead to more babies being born including white ones, but not high quality ones being raised by a family of married parents. So you're right. But the answer is not to allow birth control or abortions.