Your "links" are worthless bullshit, which is why you were unable to name a single anti-democratic movement in the West. You do not know what democracy is. You do not know what liberalism is. You do not know what anti-democracy is. You do not know what an anti-democratic movement is. You probably don't know what a political movement is, either. The only thing you "know" is, evidently, anti-GOP polemics falsely dressed up as a defense of democracy against fascism or whatever the oversocialised journalist in question wants to call this. Your "worldview" - if such a thing is even applicable to your perspective - is deeply, deeply conditioned by boring, recycled liberal propaganda which incessantly attempts to portray every minor disagreement between different types of liberal democrats (the Democratic Party, the GOP, social democrats, radlibs etc) as a fatal and menacing encounter with "anti-democratic fascism", because, of course, this fake spectacle is slightly more compelling as a mobilising myth than the competition between various factions of soulless, materialist, cynical kleptocrats. Locked in the prison of your prejudices and delusions, you close your eyes and cover your ears to reality, in the vain hope that the world itself will change to conform to the liberal myth; a world where the best and only solution to socio-political collapse is getting a slightly higher number of people to affirm the present system and values with a slightly higher amount of vigour.