Again - you've plucked from history a micro-example - indeed just a person - to make a very broad point that cannot be argued with micro examples.

No, it's a pretty major example. Segregation had not actually been outlawed in the U.S, hence why Malcolm X & Rockwell were allowed to support their ideas and even opposed the government from taking it all away.

It's like saying the alt-right today is a micro example of anti-immigration, even though Joe Biden or Trump talked about it when they were in office.

I am also not a fan of Malcolm X, who was critical of the Civil Rights movement, preferring - where possible - relatively violent methods of change.

And why do you think that was? He was a black man, so it can't be "white supremacism" that the media likes to smear.

Maybe... just maybe, he wanted racial separation because it was the more moral option? Giving blacks their own country would mean Blacks would be in charge of their own governments, their own schools, their own police force, their own hospitals. No one would be able to pin the blame on Whites or complain they were somehow a bad influence.