Jared Taylor Vs EMJ Official Thread

submitted by send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

It's disgusting how subversive these online Christians are. It's the same with Jay Dyer. Worshiping the Jewish carpenter is so much more important than preserving the civilization of Napoleon and Newton.

Well, Ethiopia has been Christian for longer than Germany and it's the same savage and animalistic country as it's always been.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think EMJ genuinely thinks a massive back to Catholicism movement could save whites. His main argument is that it's easier for the press and federal government to attack white nationalism than right wing Catholicism. For EMJ whites in America and Canada are especially vunerable because they no longer have European ethnic enclaves with implicitly pro white traditions. Europe despite all the subversion has had a lot more success creating identitarian movements. EMJ would likely chalk that up to shared language, clear ethnic boundaries and christian influenced customs. The US had both christian and pro white customs but lost them as immigrants and liberal ideologies have proliferated through Jew malice.

I found it interesting that EMJ had read Taylor but Taylor had not read EMJ. That's almost always the case in these interviews. Few in the alt right that criticism EMJ have read his work.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Few in the alt right that criticism EMJ have read his work.

Reading his work is a waste of time. You should not read his work for the same reason you shouldn't read queer feminist theory books. They're based on a nonsensical premise of tabula rasa.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Reading his work is a waste of time.

He's more of a historian then a political commentator (despite the way he presents himself in some debates).

Which of his books have you read and can you give examples of how he uses subversive writing comparable to queer feminist theory books?

It just sounds like you're anti catholic and don't want to admit a Catholic could produce any intellectual work of value. It's important to understand that EMJ is nearly in schism with the current catholic church (which is a good thing). He won't tell you that of course but it's true.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't say its subversive like queer feminist theory. I said its faulty like feminism because it presupposes tabula rasa, that biology isn't a thing. Unless you factor in racial differences and technological aspects, you can never really have a proper historical or political analysis.

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think EMJ genuinely thinks a massive back to Catholicism movement could save whites.

Then why are all the adherents hispanic lol. It's not even white adjacent ones a lot of them are very dark mestizos.

¡Viva, Cristo Rey!

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Subversive would be EMJ promoting himself as white nationalist but really trying to destroy white nationalism. He's done neither.