Aren't these surveys seem to be getting these results with all races of men as well? Since it is unlikely that many men external to an ethnic group would be partial to the ethnonationalism of that ethnic group, surely these figures are higher among Whites only?

Of course, such results seem to totally contradict commonsense. WN is practically non-existent outside of Leftist nightmares, which is why they have to constantly expand the criteria of what constitutes WN so that they can then apply the label to all sorts of political opponents, like Trump. Hence we have this bogeyman Trump, a "WN" who hires Mexicans, dates black women, coauthors a book with a Japanese man and owns property as far away as India. Hilariously, Trump has way more connections with non-whites than practically all of those smug leftists who call him a WN. He even has a quasi-cult of Indian worshippers, who deify him. Doesn't seem very "racist" to me.

How are they defining the criteria that indicate sympathy with WN? Surely there's some trickery going on, such that all sorts of men are just being regarded as "implicitly" WN. Unless something explicit like support for an ethnostate is asked, it is too big a jump to say that there is X percentage of WN sympathizers among any group of men.