you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Simply not true. Stick with the facts. Not that Europe is not facing problems.

The fact is that every Euro country is well below replacement level in fertility, doubly so just counting actual native Europeans. All of them are facing long term demographic problems and ethnic and cultural replacement. What are you claiming is not true?

You've still not mentioned any solutions. It's really unfortunate that most people on Saidit will refuse to mention their ideas for political solutions. DAR should be a place where users are not afraid to mention their solutions. You mention the "self preservation of white societies," which one can expect can be arranged with a kind of aparthied or even genocide system. Hopefully I am wrong about this.

I don't see why you bother asking for solutions when you reject out of hand that purpose the ideology itself. Nationalization of all major industry, expropriation of all businesses over a hundred people, elimination of parasitic industries (i.e. advertising, most of finance), destruction of liberal academic culture, re socialization of white men and women to re orient them towards a healthy and positive self image, promotion of family formation through economic and propaganda means, development of the welfare state (with qualifications), and most importantly an end to immigration and incentivization for non whites to either emigrate or develop their own ethno states.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thank you very much for this.

Regarding the EU fertility rate, this is easily located - at 1.53 in 2019: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20210323-2

I don't see why you bother asking for solutions when you reject out of hand that purpose the ideology itself.

This is not clear. I offer solutions. Others can offer solutions.

Regarding this:

Nationalization of all major industry, expropriation of all businesses over a hundred people, elimination of parasitic industries (i.e. advertising, most of finance), destruction of liberal academic culture, re socialization of white men and women to re orient them towards a healthy and positive self image, promotion of family formation through economic and propaganda means, development of the welfare state (with qualifications), and most importantly an end to immigration and incentivization for non whites to either emigrate or develop their own ethno states.

Have you studied the history of statecraft? This is very interesting to see on DAR - as it's a cross between German National Socialism and Soviet Communism in the 1930s. It's spot-on. I've seen pieces of this from other Saiditors, but not the whole group. Now that you've kindly provided this, I hope you won't mind if I 'debate' the issue. Essentially, all of this is part of an authoritarian government. When I ask for practical solutions, I refer specifically to solutions that can be arranged in the US democratically. Is there a scenario in which a demographically elected US government would try any of these approaches? If so, how would those people be elected? Which political affiliation would be required? There are some Republicans who talk like this, and are running for office. Are you thinking of them? Of course you don't have to answer any of these questions.

[–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Regarding the EU fertility rate, this is easily located - at 1.53

Right - this is well below replacement level and only reaches 1.53 because of non euro immigrants higher birthrate. The reality of current demographic trends is minority majority in a couple of generations in a lot of Euro countries and then finally the disappearance of non miscegenated whites in a few more.

When I ask for practical solutions, I refer specifically to solutions that can be arranged in the US democratically

Democracy in the US only extends as far as which of the liberals you're allowed to vote for. Even moderate leftism (ala Sanders) is completely unpalatable to the establishment, that's why he was openly denied the primary. Even someone like Trump who was thoroughly in the liberal camp economically was almost removed from democratically elected office by coup attempts of the intelligence agencies ("Russia gate") for threatening the flow of immigration and the MIC projects overseas.

You can only vote for who the oligarchs allow period. There's not point in discussing some radical changes needed for self preservation of say, the white working class, because they won't allow it.

Is there a scenario in which a demographically elected US government would try any of these approaches?

No

There are some Republicans who talk like this, and are running for office. Are you thinking of them?

No. Keep trying to own the rethuglicans or whatever.

Of course you don't have to answer any of these questions.

Keep sucking liberal reformist cock, maybe your betters will be generous enough to deign a slight expansion of medicaid for obese minorities in their 30's or some such, in line with the many other great triumphs of reformism.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That person is a Israeli shill

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Keep sucking liberal reformist cock

So you admit that you cannot think of any practical approaches to democratic solutions?

So you want a non-democratic solution? For example, are you in favor of a violent revolution of some sort? If so, how can it happen?

My main point - in the original question and again above and here - do you know of any practical solutions in the US that will allow you to get what you want in politics?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A lot of the things you say there at the end are great, but none of it will ever come to pass through voting in a sham election. People have to go grassroots in their own communities, which might actually produce tangible results.

[–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree