A million French citizens have signed the second letter by active soldiers

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You said it yourself they're an almost irrelevant percentage of the population. If such people became absorbed into the greater population, whites would have less black DNA than Neanderthal on average. I don't know about France but the average mulatto in the U.S. is over 60% white since the average African-American is 25% white.

It does not matter if they are a tiny percentage, they simply do not belong in France. 60% white is way too little, we should not ruin out genetics with non white blood.

The white parent doesn't get any say in what happens to their child?

The white parent can follow it's non white partner and the mulatto kid.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Now this I agree with 1000%, traitors should be shown the door or.. in minecraft

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

they simply do not belong in France

Most French probably disagree. I don't see why it's a hill you guys would die on to remove people with majority white DNA that are a small percentage of the population.

we should not ruin out genetics with non white blood

Do you consider Neanderthals white? As the plot shows whites are much closer to Africans than Neanderthals. Seeing as how the African contribution would be even less, then the genetics are already ruined for whites above 2% Neanderthal.

https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/7uis/plot_of_genetics_of_human_races_chimps_denisovans/

[–]arainynightinskyrim 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Most French probably disagree. I don't see why it's a hill you guys would die on to remove people with majority white DNA that are a small percentage of the population.

40% non white is not a tiny percentage.

Do you consider Neanderthals white? As the plot shows whites are much closer to Africans than Neanderthals. Seeing as how the African contribution would be even less, then the genetics are already ruined for whites above 2% Neanderthal.

You're moving the goal post, neanderthal genetics has nothing to do with our current situation.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're moving the goal post, neanderthal genetics has nothing to do with our current situation.

It isn't moving the goal post you're just failing to understand my argument.

40% non white is not a tiny percentage.

No one is saying that, the contribution of that non-white to the white population when it became homogenous would be a tiny percentage because the population is very small to begin with.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

  • But you're moving the goal post if you start speaking about neanderthals.
  • Even a tiny percentage will damage the genetics of the country.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Mixed people ugly