all 4 comments

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Good read. Thanks for sharing.

I Desensitization. If, however, gays can live alongside straights, visibly but as inoffensively as possible, they will arouse a low-grade alert only, which, though annoying to straights, will eventually diminish for purely physiological reasons. Straights will be desensitized.

An example that comes to mind here is the gay characters being introduced into sitcoms in the 90's. Will and Grace is prime example. The character Will Truman played by Eric McCormak is gay as is his flamboyant partner Jack McFarland played by Sean Hayes. Both characters are quite in offensive to average people and hide a lot of the realities of the homosexual lifestyle. Will and Grace in addition to Ellen saw gay characters in permanent roles and attempted to desensitize the american public against their healthy and natural aversions.

I think it's critical for dissidents to remember that when Jews compose 'thought pieces' like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or The Feinberg Dynamic Silence doctrine,or the Steinlight paper, or After the Ball they aren't just creating a wish list. Jews write these pieces as a groundwork for elaborate future campaigns that they pour billions of dollars and thousands of man hours into rolling out onto the public in a coordinated way. Suddenly the Jewish lobby, NGO's, think tanks, fund raising centers, PACs, and clubs start making sense. Jewish political organizations are the enforcers and spreaders of Jewish subversive planning. These writings aren't thought pieces they are revelations of Jew controlled slave state architecture. While it may be tempting to laugh at these writings when they are published or found we need to take them deadly serious.

[–]TheJamesRocket[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At the time I was born in the late 80s, the Western world was still very traditional and stable. Men were expected to be masculine, and women were expected to be feminine. There were gender standards to uphold, and they were taken seriously by both sexes. Inter-racial relationships were stigmatized, homosexuality was taboo, and transexualism was a vile obscenity. (And rightly so)

But by the time I was a child in the 90s, things had already begun changing. A social change was underway. Shows like Sex and the City or Ally McBeal encouraged females to become promiscous career women. Shows like Will and Grace encouraged people to tolerate homosexuals. In retrospect, it is clear that the Western world was being targeted by social engineering.

An example that comes to mind here is the gay characters being introduced into sitcoms in the 90's. Will and Grace is prime example.

That wasn't all. Willow from Buffy the Vampire Slayer was revealed to be a lesbian. Ross from Friends was originally intended to be gay. Then there was that episode from Jerry Seinfeld, where they reinforced the message about homosexuals: ''Not that theres anything wrong with that.''

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They didn't bother doing any of this for trannies. What does that mean?

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's been a few. Remember The Crying Game? There was also a massive hit in Australia called Priscilla which though technically just about drag queens was a big normalizer for that type of stuff here.

As Archvile said as well I think they kind of just snuck the whole trans thing in like a pork belly on the whole homosexual agenda. Given how closely those two issues are related in the common mind I think people just accepted the trans stuff as just a more exotic expression of homosexuality.

Something also to remember is that they need these tactics less and less now because they are so ubiquitous for Western people in the media they consume and the things they're taught in educational institutions that for many you'd have to use the same tactics to get people NOT to accept these things.