all 27 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

The speeches were great. Hail victory.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Too much focus on Jews, it is unnecessary and undermines their potential appeal. When there are millions of whites with the same views as Jews is it necessary to obsess over them?

[–]antireddit 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Out of 25 points, 1 mentions Jewish privilege. By contrast Democrats have made attacking white privilege a centerpiece of their platform. These so called Nazis are literally more tolerant towards Jews than Jewish dominated political institutions are towards whites. Think about what that says about how far gone our current political system is?

Jews are overrepresented in some elite institutions like media ownership or leadership by a factor of 40, or 4,000%. By contrast the white over representation the Democrats(and many Republicans) are attacking are by a factor of like .3 or 30%.

If continually harping about white privilege and inciting hatred of whites in order to correct overrepresentations of a few percentage points is deemed universally acceptable, why would it be considered evil and taboo to correct Jewish over representations of several THOUSAND percent, especially in Media? I dont support discrimination to correct these disparities any more than I support discrimination towards whites to correct supposed inequalities. I believe having a fair merit based system, free speech and transparency will correct any problems. But in order for that to occur people must be able to criticize Jews as openly as they criticize whites.

1 point out of 25 also addresses Israel. By contrast Democrats and Republicans have made demonizing Iran and Russia centerpieces of their platforms, despite Israel doing far more damage to Americans interests than either and meddling in American politics to a far greater extent.

Granted all of this is irrelevant. This party has zero chance to go anywhere, and while nearly all of their proposals seem eminently reasonable and less radical than the woke left or even the Democrats, the complete lack of political or leadership experience and "racist" baggage of the leaders would be an anchor around its neck. They are edgy alt right E celebs, not leaders.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I was referring to the speeches. Why not just attack the Left rather than keep framing the issue as Jews?

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We're not reactionaries or conservatives. To Hell with the right wing!

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why don't you just be honest and say that in your opinion ANY focus on Jews is too much -- except when the Demcorats and Republicans do it of course I doubt when they mention Jews and Israel you're commenting.

Every second comment I see from you is 'Hey guys let's not focus on Jews let's focus on bad Huwhites instead....'

If you don't want people talking about Jews honestly then lurk AmRen more -- nothing against Taylor PBUH.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Many users on the alt right subs only work to demoralize in every single post they make. Be aware of them.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wish I was in America. The event sounds amazing.

National Justice Now.

[–]Minedwe 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

4 We support a two percent ceiling on Jewish employment in vital institutions so that they better represent the ethnic and regional population balance of the country.

I would prefer a 0% ceiling on their population, but this is a start I guess.

[–]Nasser 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Imagine this party actually did well enough for this to be debated in congress lmao.

[–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We can only hope.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Where my führers at

[–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How do you define a vital institution though?

The real problem is the loss of faith in our own culture. I think the other points in the manifesto would go a long to reviving Western civ without resorting to quotas which have always struck me as both unworkable (and unfair).

As Kerry Bolton points out (comments section) the problems go deeper than the presence or absence of Jews (or any other ethnic group) but are intrinsic within Capitalism itself which in its relentless drive for profit atomizes society and hollows out the communities which sustain it.

Action Zealandia:

[and my computer breaks down — I'll cut and paste the relevant section later ]

[–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

overall I think NJP is grasping at straws and is hopeful at best, so obviously you must excuse their attempts to make Third Positionist and alt-right ideas palatable to normies and normie politicians.

If we are to miraculously reform America democratically into an illiberal state, a VERY lofty goal already, we must do it one step at a time. This may mean holding off on some of our points until we can redpill sufficient sections of the populace.

Although you make a VERY good point, it may even be necessary to switch out the section I quoted with the prerogative you mentioned: Anything "targeting" Jews specifically, no matter how fair and innocent, will be demonized. Unilaterally, we should focus on eradicating racial quotas and then move ahead from there.

[–]Jacinda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Having a sensible policy on permanent immigration to me is the obvious first baby step. An overwhelming majority of citizens in Western countries want it reduced (I would like to see it reversed via long term repatriation) but because elite interests benefit from a rising aggregate GDP no politician will touch it.

It should be an easy win for anyone bold enough to use it in their platform; as Trump did in 2016 but not (strangely enough) this time around.

[–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. If we are to try peaceful reformation of the system, we should start here.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

25 point platform

Comfy.

[–]Jacinda 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Came here to post that as well. It's a bold move : )

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Jacinda 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I think this is unnecessarily antagonistic toward Israel.

    Agreed.

    Declaring war on Israel — which labeling the country to be a rogue state is tantamount to doing — seems unnecessarily hostile.

    Also, if we are In favor of nations being organized along ethnic lines, then Jews also deserve their own homeland. I sympathize (to a certain extent) with the Palestinians but feel they have been used as a weapon by the Arab countries of which they were originally a part. Prussians have a greater claim to a right of return to their homeland. My Prussian descent neighbor isn't living in limbo, lobbying the UN, and committing acts of terrorism. His parents came out here (NZ) as refugees and now he is completely assimilated.

    [–]meatball4u 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Sign me up

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Nice charter. Shame only 3-5000 will ever read them. Unless they build the required support structure, it will always be another meme party

    [–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't think they imagine they will become the government any time soon. Forming a party is a way to publicize their cause.

    [–]TheWorldToCome 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Hearing Striker and Enoch talk about economics on Strike and Mike was super cringe

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Which part?

    [–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Which show. Do you have a link?

    We desperately need a sustainable economic system.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They discuss all the policy points on the latest Strike And Mike over at TRS.

    [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Why?