Debate a "leftist"

submitted by DoubleReverse from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

I'll define it for you:

Definition of bigot

:a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

Are you "devoted to your own opinions and prejudices," despite evidence contradicting those? Like in instances of "police murdering blacks?" Why are you so intolerant of the idea that some white people want their own space free of other races? A right/privilege virtually every other race has?

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

I already gave you the definition as I'm using it. Multiple times.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Then stop being so biggoted, and make an actual claim/grievance. You are wrong on "police murders" - so what exactly are we supposed to talk about?

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Read the post or shut up

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Your post is nonsense. Just vague appeals to morality and historical events. There's nothing to respond to.

Why did you even come here?

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Because for some reason I thought you might come up with a reasonable argument. That was my mistake.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Lol, 100% inverted. You don't have an actual argument or claim to speak of at this point

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

You're just refusing to acknowledge them. It's not even subtle.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Alright, so this non-debate is obviously over

I want to leave you with this - I truly meant what I said earlier - "thanks for posting here" . I run into white leftists (and non-whites, FWIW) every day - at the store, at work, etc. I've talked to hundreds - maybe, thousands - of white people with basic lefty takes. By contrast, how many white nationalists have you met in your "real life?"

Regardless - what sets you apart is that you actually came out here to find us and have a conversation. That's more than I can say for 95% of these people I've run into. Still, I've probably seen hundreds of leftists post online too. They all make the same mistakes - come in with a bunch of loaded priors, make vague appeals, etc. - and they usually get wrecked. They think we are dumb/stupid/""biggited""/whatever - just as you did. And likewise, you were totally pwned on every front in this thread. But - it's not your fault. You previously had no reason to research or back up your beliefs. You are force-fed lies and false propaganda about race and the far-right daily, but don't see them for what they are.

I know you're better than this. You had the curiosity, the courage, and the conviction to post here - and now you have the experience of trying for the first time. You aren't disowned or banned for being incorrect or being a "leftist" - I'm sure you can come in here with real evidence on a pointed topic, and prove we are wrong. I believe in you

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Make an argument or don't. I have no interest in your self righteous condescension. I wish some of you had the nuts to address the actual argument.