The Covid™ vaccines are causing cancer. (No longer "theory" - upgraded to "unofficially official".)

submitted by xolotltlalo from (twitter.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

I believe that this is not true.

Gorksi had a write up a year ago about the vaccine cancer link on science based medicine. Twitter isn't factchecked any more. You get a lot of misinformation there.

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

A year ago, when people weren't getting boosters for long enough for oncologists to notice a pattern? Gett better material.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

I can't find a more recent study. You're welcome to link me to one, of you genuinely believe there is one that supports this.

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Not my agenda

Not my problem

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I believe the cancer link to vaccines is not true.

It's an old trope. I can't see any evidence for it, there's no plausible mechanism that training the immune system would cause cancer, and it's a long refuted claim that anti-vaxers have been making for decades.

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You believe it is not true because you are coping. You cannot see a plausible mechanism because you have not looked. Anti-vaxxers claim things about vaccines for decades, which the covid jabs are not.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I believe it's not true because it wasn't true this time last year, see the science based medicine link above.

I cannot see a plausible mechanism, because having the immune system respond to a threat doesn't cause cancer. An infant's immune system will respond to thousands of new threats per day. Most of them don't get cancer.

You're welcome to link me to dune explanation, but so far making implausible statements is your agenda and your problem, but supporting them is not.

If you want to claim that MRNA vaccines aren't vaccines because that technology didn't exist when the word was defined, go ahead. But there are plenty of covid vaccines that are traditional vaccines.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I cannot see a plausible mechanism

Your medical opinion is irrelevant.

If you want to claim that MRNA vaccines aren't vaccines because that technology

Gaslighting, controlled opposition.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do most of the threats to a baby involve complete exhaustion of T cells and integrate a pro-cancer genome into their DNA? Asking for a friend.

Vaccines do specific things that the jab does not, you're saying a honda accord is a mining dump truck because it has a similar method of getting to the site.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do most of the threats to a baby involve complete exhaustion of T cells and integrate a pro-cancer genome into their DNA? Asking for a friend.

Explain to your friend that "Genome" means "the complete set of genes or genetic material present in a cell or organism."

It's not something that can be "integrated" into DNA. it's all 3.2 billion base pairs in a human's DNA.

Also tell your friend that t-cell exhaustion happens with chronic infections and cancer. It doesn't happen in an infection that lasts a few weeks.

you're saying a honda accord is a mining dump truck because it has a similar method of getting to the site.

Teaching the immune system to respond to a dangerous infection by showing it something less dangerous, is called a vaccine.

This has very little to do with dump trucks, which really only cause heath problems by crashing into other vehicles or pedestrians. You can't vaccinate against that.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

k

[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Isn't a vaccine supposed to prevent getting the disease? How come every one who is boosted still gets covid? Doesn't that make calling it a vaccine a lie?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It does prevent the disease. But by training the immune system, which still has to fight off the infection.

The ones they were rolling out in the US were about 95% effective at preventing symptoms. I think there are specific vaccines against current variants, so i assume that means that the effectiveness of the original vaccines are reduced.

Even the rabies vaccine is called a "vaccine". It's close to 0% at preventing symptoms. It just gives you a day or two more to get to a hospital before the permanent nerve damage sets in.

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So neither is a vaccine. That is a lie. Got it.

[–]no_u 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes - and it's surprising what the anti-vaxers will accept as evidence in this case (because there is NONE), whereas the results of billions of COVID shots, along with extensive international medical science research among thousands of doctors and researchers is somehow hogwash, directed by some number cruncher at Pfizer, according to this guy on Twitter.