you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Ok link to it. Because so far the only person who has linked to data here is me. So tell me what you're looking at and we can examine it together

Oh- and - do you now admit you were wrong when you said

Bigs clearly proposed that hiding the data was horrific, not redness at injection site

Because the quote I gave you above seems to prove otherwise

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Horrifically - that which is shocking.

Dangerous - that which could cause harm or injury.

I initially thought this was in response to the final comment by Bigs, but the comment you refer to would still stand up to scrutiny based on the frequency at which harm appears to have occurred. If I were to perform a risk assessment based on the data provided, I'd say that the likelihood were high for a minor injury.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Look at the knots you're having to tie yourself in to avoid looking at actual data

minor injury

Oh - a minor injury like, my arm is sore because someone pushed a metal needle into it? Yeah I think those odds are quite high too. Most people past the age of ~12 or so can get through it without a lollipop though, not sure whether you're in that cohort

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Almost 800,000 needed medical care, 15% emergency room and 10% were hospitalised. Are you forgetting that for young people and for much older or vulnerable people, getting severe chills, fatigue, vomiting and diarrhea can be very serious?

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Am I supposed to take your word for it? Why are you so adverse to sourcing real data? Do you have an adverse effect to real data? Have you been innoculated against reality somehow

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That's from the link you provided, or are you suggesting that I require a source that proves vulnerable people are vulnerable?

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Ah great thanks, sorry I didn't realise you were referring to the same slides.

800k getting more severe flu-like symptoms from the covid jab, out of 224million vaccinated Americans. That's 0.37%

Covid kills between 0.5% and 3.5% depending on the study. Source below.

So you are up to 9x more likely to DIE from covid than get non-minor flu-like symptoms from the vax.

So thanks for selecting data to talk about which proves the case for vaccination.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Covid kills between 0.5% and 3.5% depending on the study. Source below.

Deaths where COVID was recorded on the death certificate, typically where a test was positive within 28 days prior to the death. Could include anything, obesity, cancer, gunshot wound to the head. Considering the data provided relating to the side.effevts from your slides is likely under representative, and the death rate of COVID over representative, they probably run quite close in percentages.

I tend not to appreciate running even very low percentages as a positive though, considering the high level of distribution. It still matters. If 0.37% of airline passengers suffered minor injury, all air travel would be halted immediately due to the 14,000 or so flights per day.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh wow you were able to familiarise yourself with all the studies and methodologies linked really really quickly there.

still matters. If 0.37% of airline passengers suffered minor injury, all air travel would be halted immediately due to the 14,000 or so flights per day

Okay well what if air travel was totally new and had been recently invented and rushed out to prevent the deaths of millions? What if, the absence of air travel, people were basically confined to their houses and the economy was on life support and society was starting to unravel at the edges. (Remember the zombehs protesting for a haircut or whatever at the lockdown protests?)

Do you still think 0.37% of getting the shits for a day or two would shut down air travel in that scenario?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

COVID didn't kill millions of people numbnuts, it was a mild cold 🙄

Obesity kills 2 million Americans every year and nobody gives a shit and nobody has to fiddle the numbers to make is sound more deadly than it is.