Are They Going to Frame Russia With a False Flag Bioweapon Like They Did to China?

submitted by raven9 from (self.conspiracy)

So the NATO allies have repeatedly denied they had bioweapons labs in Ukraine. Even in the United Nations they denied it. Until invading Russian troops approach. Now they say they are concerned that "research materials" in Ukraine's "biological research facilities" might fall into Russian hands.

So basically we can see right there. The NATO denial of those labs was blatent lies (We now know Black and Veatch built them under a U.S. government DTRA contract.)[1]

So what was the U.S. government's purpose for building bio-weapons labs right there by Russias border? We already know they were expecting a Russian invasion. The CIA has been training Ukrainian anti-Russian Paramilitaries in preparation for exactly that since 2015. [2]

So they built a string of bioweapons labs right there in what they expected could be a hot zone. Could it be so on the event of an invasion they can release bio-warfare agents and blame Russian invasion troops for it?[3]

  1. Black and Veatch - Ukraine BSL-3 Lab

  2. CIA-trained Ukrainian paramilitaries may take central role if Russia invades

  3. Ukraine Bioweapons Labs Map

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]In-the-clouds 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe Ukraine will be the next Wuhan.

Prophetic messages have revealed that more plagues are on the way. Tuberculosis and Cholera could come back. COVID injections have impaired the immune systems of many, making them more susceptible to infections.

Lab research has been done on tuberculosis in primates, purposefully infecting them, and then accidentally releasing them where they contact humans. Remember Curious George?

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

China did nothing wrong.

Lol.

[–]raven9[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Just apply some critical thinking. The only reason for the initial assumption that China was the origin was at the time, the Wuhan outbreak appeared to be the place where the virus first emerged. We now know the evidence shows the virus was already spreading in Europe for months before that Wuhan outbreak. To continue to claim China was the origin is to say, "ok so it was spreading in Europe first but we are going to find a different reason why China is to blame". To me, that looks a lot like a concerted effort to frame China and usually in those kinds of circumstances the one doing all the finger pointing and accusing is the real perpetrator and the more you look at it the more obvious that is.

As we now know it was spreading in Europe first, it would have to be one hell of a coincidence that the first hospital to actually identify it just happened to be where Fauci's Wuhan Lab is at so the real questions should be who really put the virus in the city of Wuhan.

Just to look back at that original assumption, the claim that because it was first identified in Wuhan meant it had to have originated there was complete nonsense to begin with. No one with any kind of scientific background believes 'he who smelt it dealt it' so how did that narrative become mainstream? The same way it always does. Stupid politicians invent stupid lies and the mainstream media propaganda machine perpetuates them.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You need to apply some logical thinking yourself.

China did all the leg work promoting the virus. They are the ones who claimed it came from their country, no one else made them, from the markets, which they know is a lie. They are the ones who created and broadcast those ludicrous videos of people dropping dead in the street to scare everyone. They are the ones who created the lockdown protocol and then claimed it was the reason they successfully controlled the virus. It wasn't just first identified in Wuhan, it was given a whole narrative there.

You seem to think the virus being in Europe first means the Chinese were set up. How the hell does that fit with how the Chinese behaved in hyping up the virus and spreading fear? It doesn't. It doesn't fit with reality at all.

If the virus was in Europe first the that suggests the Chinese released it there to attack the West, nothing more. Everyone knows they kept allowing foreign travel while they were supposedly locking people in their apartments to starve. That indicates a tactic to spread it abroad but limit its spread in China. They are only seeing a real rise in deaths now.

You can't apply critical thinking of you ignoring all the facts.

Being so anti-West that you think bad actors in other parts of the world have to be all poor victims who can never be responsible for anything they do isn't smart. You are just being a mug to someone else's games.

[–]MobiusRacetrack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They lied about severity and spread. They bullshitted the WHO for 2 weeks.

[–]raven9[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the Chinese were behind it then releasing it in Europe several months before hyping it up in Wuhan makes zero sense. It also makes zero sense for the Chinese to incriminate themselves by doing that. It is far more likely the videos were made by actors. Probably not even in China.