Radical conspiracism as a tool of the ruling groups. History as the foundation of ethics.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from (self.conspiracy)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Being provable makes it more reliable in my eyes. I'd like to hear your thoughts on why you wouldn't call it so?

Skepticism is good, yes, but doubting the reality of your experiences is not. Not saying you necessarily do this, I am unsure, but many people who look into these things will doubt an extra-ordinary experience in the name of comfort. There is such a thing as being too closed minded, but I am certain you already know this from past experience, as do I. In fact, having a closed mind on certain topics will end up prohibiting one from the experiences related to said topics.