I agree. He posts good content and I didn't observe any kind of 180 degrees from him. And it's good to give people the benefit of the doubt. TPTSNB want use mistrusting of each other and divided. If someone says something that sounds implausible, take it with a grain of salt, I'd say, but don't call each other shill over nothing.

That being said, I also find Jesus more convincing here, especially the article he posted about the Jesuit control narrative being perpetuated as a deflection mechanism makes sense to me. It reminds me of a debate I listened to about this subject^1, where the Jesuit accuser also wasn't convincing. So I'm keeping this in the back of my mind. Also note the ad hominems Hibiki employs in this thread. That's kind of a tell. But so long as we take nobody's word for granted, shills can't do much harm. Therefore I'm indifferent to him being a shill or not.

1. For the sake of completeness: this is the entire audio I listened to, of which the debate is a part. The debate is the most interesting part, though.