I have to admit, there is something magical about Joe Biden

submitted by ZeroFeetAway from (self.conspiracy)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AcceleratedWallops 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Shit man, you better bring this evidence to Guiliani so maybe he can actually win a court case. 🙄

Urban counties voting Democrat? My god, unheard of!

[–]Urkleburkle 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Problem; the cases were all dismissed. No evidence was presented.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ah yes, the grand conspiracy of every judge in the country!

Or could it be...Guiliani says different things in the courtroom than he says on TV, and the judges find it absolutely ridiculous because they aren't retarded? 🤔

[–]Urkleburkle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How many of those cases were filed by Guiliani?

How many of those judges were installed by the swamp?

[–]Rationalmind 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. Guiliani is a criminal prosecutor who is not skilled in civil election law. No specialist lawyer wanted to touch Trump because of the sjw mob culture in the legal profession. It’s not Guliani’s area of expertise.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

LOL of course it's the SJWs fault Trump's team can't muster any evidence. LOL the mental gymnastics, I love it, fucking adorable

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Legal cases would usually take a long time, trying to make evidence in a court format in 1 month is probably really hard.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Endorsing the end of elections that at least attempt to appear legitimate will probably be less beneficial to you than you believe.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You mistake me -- legitimate elections are absolutely necessary. But evidence, in this case, is sorely lacking.

[–]Node 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

evidence, in this case, is sorely lacking.

The lie does work, which is why it's so common. But my above sentiment remains.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Lie? Do you have some evidence that Guiliani doesn't know about?

[–]Node 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Why would I believe anything a Guiliani says? People don't reach the positions he's had unless they're cabal whitelisted.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

In that case, why would you believe anything Trump says?

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Why would you believe I believe anything Trump says? Where are you getting that from? Certainly not from me.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I may have misunderstood your initial comment.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But evidence, in this case, is sorely lacking.

This is where your opinion is the opposite of tens of millions of Americans. I forget the actual numbers, but it's very large. Aside from the actual fraud itself, it's a problem when a large percentage of the population believes the government is illegitimate.

There, I think I finally came up with a way to say that pretty neutrally.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://populist.press/election-fraud-evidence-mounts-dems-divert-attention/

One example of around 4000 videos, posts, and claims about fraud I've seen across the country. The difference with this one is that it's by a news outlet, rather than individuals.

Whether some person takes those to court or not is irrelevant. What is relevant is that it's all credible enough for millions to take it seriously.