you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

It's fake news, the Pope can't be arrested because he's an absolute monarch. Even if he had charges levied against him in Italy, he could just hide in the Vatican until he dies and never come out.

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah he has a literal army that can prevent him from being arrested.

Can you imagine what it must be like to have 1000 people sworn to defend your ability to not be arrested?

If he was in some trouble I imagine we'd see him stop traveling and stop doing group meetings with the masses and staying in the Vatican buildings.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

That makes this pretty awkward then.

https://twitter.com/Pontifex/status/1348268429715845120

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

"apparently"

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

All these tweets you keep linking are from poor sources. They don't even have that many likes, shares, etc. so it could be fabricated.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Doubt injection and attacking the messenger, huh?
That's convenient.

muh sources

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You can't convince me of your argument by linking a tweet with fifty likes, you just can't. Maybe you're right, maybe you're wrong, but you have to get me some real evidence.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

consensus = veracity

I think you need a bib.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The fact that your argument is a personal attack implies that you have no real evidence.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm glad you're finally understanding why you're an idiot.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Boy, this sure is a lot of coincidence...

https://twitter.com/CesareSacchetti/status/1348345530162798592