you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That kind of pseudo intellectual argument can be used to discredit literally anyone without any evidence. For example: When you begin with "trans women are real women" type of science you can go almost anywhere. So now anyone who agrees with the leftist propaganda is not credible in any scientific capacity. That includes all the mainstream sources you worship. No one in mainstream science is standing up to leftist propaganda. They deny IQ science. They Support giving preteens hormone blockers. And that doesn't even begin to address outright financial corruptions where corporations fund science to produce results they want regardless of reality. All of that is done by mainstream scientists and you don't apply that same one strike and you're out bullshit to them. You have a double standard and that standard is that if it is a mainstream source they can do no wrong and if it isn't all you have to do is dig through the trash to find one fault on which you can claim they must be wrong because of some unrelated flaw. This is pure retarded sheep logic.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't begin with 'trans women are women' as a scientific theory, or even a hypothesis. 'trans women are women' is more of a cultural issue. The actual science behind androgyny is fascinating. Look up 'complete androgen insensitivity syndrome'.