you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

When you begin with "vaccines cause autism" type of a "science", you can go almost anywhere. They are worse than flat earthers. You can say I am ignorant. But being anti-anti-vax is not ignorant. Knowing climate change is real in not ignorant. Maybe one could make the case against glyphosate? These fools are not qualified to do so.

[–]Velocity 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Your anti science quackery has no power here. You're like a flat earther

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I am anti-science because I am pro vaccine?

[–]Velocity 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

If you actually studied the topic instead of parroting your precious high priest pharmaceutical employees words. You would clearly see that the subject is in great dispute. I'm guessing you're a masktard too. Maybe just put your muzzle on and keep your head down. Obviously thinking isn't your strong point.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

I mainly know the math. They collect data on both the vaccine and a placebo then apply a binomial probability distribution to both sets of data. The greater the sample size, the less likely there is a statistical error. If efficacy exists, one will definitely see how effective it is as the sample size approaches infinity. But you do not need an infinite sample sample size to have reasonable confidence. I don't think you have the IQ to understand that.

[–]Velocity 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Yeah, I'm aware of how Pharma Mega Corporations game data to achieve desired results to boost sales. I've been studying abstracts, papers and methodologies ad nauseum for years. It's appalling. Judging from past performance, their injections are no where near the efficacy that they claim.

I've been researching this since a vax.x shot killed my friend many years ago, spookmobile. If you think these corps care anything about your health, you are either a naive idiot or another Pharma sponsored shill that spreads their unique cancer all over the internet. And I've dealt with those filthy whores long before you even knew what the internet was.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

You might as well claim the earth is flat.

[–]Velocity 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Questioning corporate integrity does not equal flat earth junk. If you think mega corporations value your life and health over profit, it is then you that is living in a fantasy land. Cognitive dissonance... yes that's the feeling you're having.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I don't see anybody catching small pox.

And your hypocrisy is insane. You know that corporations can be corrupt, but the moment and Democrat says so, you cry socialist.

I am the one who is consistent. For you to be consistent, you would have to believe in flat earth. Flat earth is anti-vax too.

[–]Velocity 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You're not making any sense. FE and questioning vaccine safety are two vastly divergent topics. You still haven't addressed anything and are content with trying to establish a false equivalence. Corporations that have no liability or accountability should be circumspect to severe scrutiny.

And your hypocrisy is insane.

....uhm..was that just fun to say or do you have something to backup your opinion with?

but the moment and Democrat says so

Not a partisan issue.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That kind of pseudo intellectual argument can be used to discredit literally anyone without any evidence. For example: When you begin with "trans women are real women" type of science you can go almost anywhere. So now anyone who agrees with the leftist propaganda is not credible in any scientific capacity. That includes all the mainstream sources you worship. No one in mainstream science is standing up to leftist propaganda. They deny IQ science. They Support giving preteens hormone blockers. And that doesn't even begin to address outright financial corruptions where corporations fund science to produce results they want regardless of reality. All of that is done by mainstream scientists and you don't apply that same one strike and you're out bullshit to them. You have a double standard and that standard is that if it is a mainstream source they can do no wrong and if it isn't all you have to do is dig through the trash to find one fault on which you can claim they must be wrong because of some unrelated flaw. This is pure retarded sheep logic.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't begin with 'trans women are women' as a scientific theory, or even a hypothesis. 'trans women are women' is more of a cultural issue. The actual science behind androgyny is fascinating. Look up 'complete androgen insensitivity syndrome'.