you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (33 children)

Papacy is owned by the Rothschilds. The rothschilds bailed out the papacy twice, to the tune of billions of dollars. They're on the hook. Just another branch of the Rothschild central banking beast

JP Morgan and his Rothschild friends created the Federal Reserve and now a Jesuit is the head of it. What more proof is needed? It's not like the Federal Reserve changed hands in the last 100 years, it's still the same banks and people owning it now as then.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Morgan, Seligman, Loeb, Schiff, Warburg had the biggest hand in creating the central bank via the reorganization of central banking through membership banks. Rothschild was there but using his agents through thirdparties.

Nobody thinks Jews own the entire world. But is Warburg, Lehman, Seligman, Schiff and Loeb, Jesuits or Jews? Was Hamilton a Jesuit, the person who is praised today and has destroyed what Jefferson envisioned, no he was from a Jewish family.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

But is Warburg, Legman, Seligman, Schiff and Loeb, Jesuits or Jews?

They're also men. But saying "men run the world" is lacking in accuracy, is it not?

I like sticking with names, the worst of the worst should not get away with blending in to the crowd!

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sticking with names is good, I guess it helps to stay as objective as possible and others can then makes their own conclusions.

These men above, the lot of them Jews are part of a network of non-Jew men; industrialists, Lawyers, politicians and bankers who care not about the middle and lower classes.

HOWEVER, the Torah and Talmud say that Jews should charge interest to other nations and non-Jews but not to other Jews. Christ was killed by Rome and Hillel sect of Jews who were part of the pro-creditor class. None of these men, whether Jewish or not, care about the middle and lower class but it certainly is interesting that many of these men, as Jews, in their holy books write exactly what they would then do.

Names are certainly good. But Yeshua is free to be attacked by media constantly, why cannot the Torah and Talmud be scrutinized? It gives these men precedent to do this through "Gods" instructions. Just like how the Catholics used Jewish old Testement verses to rile up their armies and plunder "heretic" lands and murder them.

Anti-Semitism is a misnomer. Anti-Judaic is the right word, and most Religious Jews are anti-Christian. I only critcize Jews, Catholics and any men who fall into the catagory of parasites and plunderers.

Today attacks on Jews somehow equal attacks on race. But I never attack on race. I could care less about race as the Jew Gilad Atzmon pointed out. All I care about is speaking the truth I know.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

HOWEVER, the Torah and Talmud say that Jews should charge interest to other nations and non-Jews but not to other Jews

Yup which is the exact reason that many of the first historical "billionaires" were jews because they were the only ones with the ability to charge interest for loans.

I don't mind people scrutinizing jews, or men, or any group. I think we just have to be very very precise about where we place blame for the world's largest problems, if that's the subject at hand.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it doesn't help that I still do not know if Jews are a race or not? Or if Zionists and Nazis created the Jewish blood purity and race card to categorize them better either for, Nazis: persecution or, Zionists: union under Zionism.

Herzl the originator of political Zionism dabbled with Christianity and his sons were quite confused as whether they were Jews but still strived to be Christians one of which commited suicide. Herzl dreamed of emigrating all of the Diaspora to Israel and then to convert them to Christianity, which to me, isn't exactly the aspirations of Orthodox Judaism.

I was always taught and Jews were always taught since biblical times up until the 16th century that they were a religious people. Their Holy books, whether the Jewish Cabala, Babylonian Talmud and all of it's ridiculous laws or Torah were a part of Jewish life.

At that time no Jew thought they were Jew by race or blood. It was a religion after all.

And that's fine, we can scrutinize this but now there is a humdrum of secular Zionists of whom call themselves Jews, mismatching but sometimes working wholeheartedly with Hasidic Jews and then the leftist Jewish Zionists in the media attacking anyone who even questions 9/11. It doesn't help that many of these Jews use Judaism as a race.

Judaism and what it is to be a Jew is very hard to figure out. All that I do know is that Yeshua was killed by the pro-Creditor class of Jews and Rome. And look at what we have now!

A bunch of pro-creditor class Jews propagandizing the common next door neighbor Jew, and Roman Law with a bunch of Catholics by their side.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a great story written by Richard Pettigrew about how a banker operates. It is in the opening chapters of his book American Plutocracy.

It is a story about how the banker gets his start. He changes his name, as did many of the original bankers and their lackeys did, like the alias Belmont, a Rothschild agent, and operates in a mining town by charging each miner interest on small loans. To the individual miner it looks quite a small fee. But he obtains his money in the amount of people he charges this small fee. Eventually he makes enough money to leave and start a bank in San Francisco where he is lavished by the economic world. The miners finally figure out who he is, but now he has a different name. They all remembered him but he never talked much and always sat himself in the corners of rooms.

That basically was the story.

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

a very tired argument. no, the rotschilds were instructed to provide money to their masters as is the duty of a treasurer.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

It's not "a tired argument", it's factual history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_loans_to_the_Holy_See

The person receiving the loan is subservient to the lender, because interest is charged.

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

that is just a form they used for the money transfers. they had to put in a legal shape of some kind.

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Yeah, but the rothschilds are still the ones with the money, and the vatican the ones who desperately needed it. Just the same scenario they used to entrap all the other european countries in the 1820s and 1830s

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

no, the rotschilds hold the money, launder the money, but it is not their money. they did entrap national economies, as agents of the vatican, to make the papacy all powerful, not themselves.

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

they did entrap national economies, as agents of the vatican

If they were agents of the vatican, then the vatican wouldn't have needed to borrow billions of dollars from the rothschilds at interest...

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

as i said, they had to put it in some formal shape. the jesuits just took over the papacy after a war. the treasury was empty..

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

yes but none of that means the rothschilds weren't still in charge of the papacy...

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

at no point were they in charge of it

[–]Big_Brass_Balls 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

kikes run the banks, the media and the US government. The Rothschilds are part of that Kikery.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

the jesuits run the 'kikes', to say nothing of the world governments.

The Rothschilds are part of that Kikery.

no, they are subservient to rome.