YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool

submitted by zyxzevn from (bitchute.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (32 children)

Nobody is stealing from him. Jeez get over yourself.

And Brand's "narrative" didn't change.

The change that caused demonetization would be the news story, evidencing that he's a rapist creep.

You cannot force YT to go into business with someone they don't want to - like a rapist creep. If someone decided not to do business with a rapist creep, they shouldn't be forced to.

but the narrative Brand is presenting has become both too uncomfortable and too popular.

Absolutely garbage nonsense.

The bullshit fake news which Brand regurgitates IS uncomfortable but not because it's "too true"....but because it's drawn from conspiritard rambling and protocols of zion

[–]stickdog 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

LOL. So now Brand is an antisemitic just like Jeremy Corbyn?

Do you also applaud the imprisonment of Assange?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Did you have any on-topic response or you just want me to help you build those straw men

[–]stickdog 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

Do you also applaud the imprisonment of Assange?

Thanks for making the answer to this question clear.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Lol imagine complaining that I didn't help you build an off-topic strawman to attack. You're like an infant. Little baby wants me to help him invent offtopic reasons to disregard the good and on topic points I raised.

Hey there little one.

Russel Brand is a rapist and nobody wants to work with him. It's not cancel culture. It's the predicable outcome of his horrible actions

[–]stickdog 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

So he has been convicted of rape?

No. He has not even been charged with rape. None of his accusers have so much as filed a single police report against him.

So on what basis is Youtube stealing his money?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Wow you are just desperate to get a strawman up and running, aren't you!

Is it really so difficult to grapple with the actual facts of the matter.

Nobody is stealing, you precious baby snowflake.

I personally don't think yt ought to be FORCED by law to do business, with someone they don't want to, when the reason for them not wanting to, is not a protected characteristic.

Please put down your stupid infantile strawman tactics and look at the facts of this story

[–]stickdog 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

LOL. Then why is Youtube still "doing business" with Brand by airing Brand's content with ads while stealing Brand's agreed upon cut of this revenue?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

How pathetic for you to keep, keep insisting that's it's stealing.

Hey how about this

How about Brand just stop uploading to YT. Then there won't be any accusation that they're stealing from him.

He could even delete his whole back catalogue. That would really show them!

[–]stickdog 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

LOL.

That's what you are reduced to in order to "defend" the FACT that YT is still streaming and generating revenue from every fucking video Brand has ever uploaded, but is just using a corporate media hit piece against him as its excuse to steal his share of the revenue?

Is there any sort of corporate malfeasance that you will not defend to the death?

If a bank "did not want to do business with him anymore," would you support that bank confiscating his deposits?

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

YT is a monopoly and as such it could be forced to do business in a sane economy (like the EU). There is no stealing, but there is a legal case for depriving someone of income by abuse of power.

[–]Maggotus 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Evidencing? that he is a rapist creep? Do you have any of that Evidencing? Or are you just another anonymous source? Unlike all of the legitimate sources that Brand uses when he talks about the real things that are going on in the world. Were you there for his Rapist creeping? Are you an eye witness or just another internet troll?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

His rape victim showed the medical paperwork from the rape treatment center, where she was treated the morning after he raped her.

Another victim says she was 16 when Brand tried to choke her out during oral.

When someone reports the events that happened to them.....that's called evidence, dipshit.

Why didn't you read the Times article and familiarise yourself with the allegations, before calling me a troll. You fucking moron

[–]stickdog 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

medical paperwork from the rape treatment center,

Why don't you show us all of that paperwork?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why would I? Why don't you DYOR dipshit

[–]stickdog 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't that what corporate media is for?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Knock yourself out then

[–]Kiera_Ramm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would be divine justice if all the women defending this rapist were raped by him themselves, who am I kidding, they would probably enjoy it. If I trusted bihet women at all I would probably be disgusted and disappointed

People complain about an unequal and unjust wealth distribution but there's a more insidious societal issue that nobody talks about. That problem is the lopsided rape distribution. Too many child abuse victims are being raped, and not enough moids or female moid-enablers

[–]JoeyJoeJoe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So in summary: "Critical thinking is racist".

Good job.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol nice strawman homey. Gonna be real easy for you to knock that strawman down.

A lot harder to actually deal with the good points I raised.

You can't force YT to stay in business with a creepy rapist. Do you think that YT should be forced by law to do business with brand?

[–]topiary2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You seem to be the only retard these days that uses the term fake news yet you have mentioned nothing to support that claim against him

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok you can feel free to disagree with my interpretation of his work. What else would you like to disagree about, or are we otherwise in alignment