Election Interference? YouTube Aggressively Censoring Videos Featuring RFK Jr. in Futile Attempt to Silence Him
submitted 10 months ago by [deleted] from (thefreethoughtproject.com)
[–]IkeConn 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (1 child)
The DNC will Bern him for sure.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (16 children)
[deleted]
[–]Inuma 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (15 children)
Al Guart expressed dismay over the removal in a statement, remarking, “YouTube just banned my interview with RFK Jr. for allegedly violating ‘community standards.’ RFK Jr. and I covered many topics of public interest and there was no threat or harm contained in the hour-long discussion.” Guart also highlighted that the podcast was gaining traction and popularity on other platforms.
READ THE GODDAMN ARTICLE!!!!
It's not a query to the Youtube engine, they're taking down videos!
They're even targeting Jordan Peterson if he's interviewing RFK
The POINT is constantly that interviews are taken down right along with people, not that they can't search him, you goof.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago* (14 children)
[–]Inuma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (13 children)
You're seeing him whine about something for which he's not provided proper evidence.
It's his OWN VIDEO!!!
As usual Phooey's source has NO credibility.
Looks
Media bias factcheck
You literally have to be told what to hate based on a goddamn factcheck. Dude, you don't even think for yourself. Funding is based on Google which shows they are influenced by whatever wind that Google is going. This isn't "independence" here, it's a conflict of interest. Google ad revenue compromises the integrity of the site and can't be trusted for a fair or accurate assessment of Google responses. That's journalism 101. I'm not even going to bother with the Snigel issues, just focus on Google for that one. I dismiss that site with prejudice.
NO - there is no aggressive attempt to silence RFK Jr. Stop whining like a little bitch about misinformation you think is factual. You can also get all of your misinformation from
Blah blah blah, you can't figure out that the Jordan Peterson video substantiates and refutes your query and you have yet to have a counter claim.
You really SUCK at substantiation.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (12 children)
[–]Inuma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (11 children)
The election interference would be Google doing this at the behest of the Biden Administration.
Especially when old threats are considered
But what's amazing is how you ignore the constant repression in the face of evidence, simply because you can query him on different platforms instead of seeing the censorship such as done with the Jordan Peterson video or any other video taken down by Google. I guess those blinders come extra thick for you.
Hell, Even Fox News is covering this
"[YouTube] just pulled another of my videos, with former NY Post political reporter [Guart]," Kennedy wrote in a Tuesday Twitter thread. "People made a big deal about Russia supposedly manipulating internet information to influence a Presidential election. Shouldn’t we be worried when giant tech corporations do the same?" "When industry and government are so closely linked, there is little difference between ‘private’ and ‘government’ censorship," he continued. "Suppression of free speech is not suddenly OK when it is contracted out to the private corporations that control the public square."
"[YouTube] just pulled another of my videos, with former NY Post political reporter [Guart]," Kennedy wrote in a Tuesday Twitter thread. "People made a big deal about Russia supposedly manipulating internet information to influence a Presidential election. Shouldn’t we be worried when giant tech corporations do the same?"
"When industry and government are so closely linked, there is little difference between ‘private’ and ‘government’ censorship," he continued. "Suppression of free speech is not suddenly OK when it is contracted out to the private corporations that control the public square."
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (10 children)
[–]Inuma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (9 children)
Nice projection from someone incapable of substantiation.
Maybe next time you'll try something besides a query to get your point across since you can't survive without a media fact check paid by Google to guide your thoughts.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (8 children)
[–]Inuma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (7 children)
Did Google pay you to say that?
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
[–]IkeConn 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] (16 children)
[deleted]
[–]Inuma 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (15 children)
[–][deleted] (14 children)
[deleted]
[–]Inuma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (13 children)
[–][deleted] (12 children)
[deleted]
[–]Inuma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (11 children)
[–][deleted] (10 children)
[deleted]
[–]Inuma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–][deleted] (8 children)
[deleted]
[–]Inuma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)