Dave Chappelle performed 'FAKE' Saturday Night Live monologue in rehearsal before unveiling new version on air... as he's blasted for anti-Semitic jokes by the ADL

submitted by [deleted] from (dailymail.co.uk)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

One of the first tenets of communism is central banking. There are many layers to the psychology of why the world's most powerful people in high finance central banking allow communism to exist as the pinnacle of sheep herding ideology for commoners. Communism forms a symbiosis of overthrowing nations, to try to fold them into a one world government ruled by technocratic elites. Globalists have bankrolled a 150 year Zionist-communist religion, successfully converting the "revolutionary" spirit in weak people to empower globalist finance agendas (race hustling, feminism, vax poison, medical tyranny, cashless society, mark of the beast, NWO one world government, fake "science", fake "environmentalism") while those peons remain in their slave class status.

Leaders being bankrolled are smarter. The followers are extra dumb. That's the power of Hollywood fiction making them fear the alternative of "another holocaust" if they allow anyone to criticize the top elites who hide behind hijacked Jewish identity for this exact reason. It's a vicious cycle and it forms a paradox that backfires, because the commoner jews feed the vicious cycle by not acknowledging this sickness (out of fear) and it makes the commoner non-jews angrier. For some reason all others can face criticism all day long but not them? Vicious power game.

[–]Insider 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

how was the central banking system created in the Western world? Did they implement communism in order to create the Federal Reserve?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

Communist society also involves the absence of private property, social classes, money, and the state. Communists often seek a voluntary state of self-governance, but disagree on the means to this end.

Based on this definition of communism, how do elites and slaves exist if there are no social classes? How do states rule without a state? How do they have central banking without money?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There have been communist states, thats obviously an incorrect definition, but so is his. He is referring to 'Cultural Marxism' which ironically isn't something Marx wrote about, but seems to mean any socially authoritarian left wing government.

To have Communism you just need some arrangement that lacks markets, and public ownership of the means of production, as opposed to capitalism having a market economy with privately owned means of production.

[–]Insider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

have there been states with purely public ownership of the means of production?

It seems as if that most countries are mixed, with a few things that are publicly owned, but controlled through the government. 10 Euro countries where public ownership is completely normal: https://weownit.org.uk/blog/top-10-countries-where-public-ownership-totally-normal

But I don't hear those countries being referred to as commie states.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

have there been states with purely public ownership of the means of production?

Yes, for instance the USSR

"Private ownership of enterprises and property had essentially remained illegal throughout the Soviet era, with Soviet communism emphasizing national control over all means of production but human labor"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatization_in_Russia

Also communist China - under Mao, not the capitalists masquerading as communists in the CCP

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3024256

Also Communist Cuba

https://time.com/5937706/cuba-private-business/

If you don't have mostly complete public ownership of capital, it isn't really Communism. But anyways, these are your textbook Marxist states, and they all have this defining feature