all 44 comments

[–]tyranicaloverlord 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

I grow tired of Jews hiding behind the claims of antisemitism when they are criticized.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

Just today I realized what a strange thing it is to have a racial anti-defamation organization. I have never seen this outright phrased as 'our goal is to stop people from criticizing us or we'll sue you', rather than something more innocuous like the Association for the Advancement of Colored People, which just implies they want to better their conditions rather than very specifically making it their mission to prevent criticism of anyone of that group. With that name, it's just kind of sitting out there in the open that Jews can't be criticized, it's not even disguised and still nobody takes notice of this

[–]Yin 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

The NAACP was started by communist jews serving international banking. It wasn't started to "help" black people.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The NAACP was started by communist jews serving international banking. It wasn't started to "help" black people.

My comment had more to do with the optics of the name.

While the two group's missions may be similar, one sounds like its job is innocuously 'helping' black people, while the other one basically announces it's intent to silence anyone who might criticize them

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I understand, although my comment is more for informing lurkers who may not know. Most people don't know the origins of central banking and various anti-white race hustling institutions. Communists have long written about the effectiveness of using the "the black cause" to stoke radical breakdowns in institutions. They understand social engineering. They enjoy overthrowing civilizations and people they hate and being bankrolled by globalist bankers who enjoy the same.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

my comment is more for informing lurkers who may not know

🙏

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

🙂🙏

[–]Insider 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

are communist jews extra dumb? considering they gained all their wealth and power through capitalism

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

One of the first tenets of communism is central banking. There are many layers to the psychology of why the world's most powerful people in high finance central banking allow communism to exist as the pinnacle of sheep herding ideology for commoners. Communism forms a symbiosis of overthrowing nations, to try to fold them into a one world government ruled by technocratic elites. Globalists have bankrolled a 150 year Zionist-communist religion, successfully converting the "revolutionary" spirit in weak people to empower globalist finance agendas (race hustling, feminism, vax poison, medical tyranny, cashless society, mark of the beast, NWO one world government, fake "science", fake "environmentalism") while those peons remain in their slave class status.

Leaders being bankrolled are smarter. The followers are extra dumb. That's the power of Hollywood fiction making them fear the alternative of "another holocaust" if they allow anyone to criticize the top elites who hide behind hijacked Jewish identity for this exact reason. It's a vicious cycle and it forms a paradox that backfires, because the commoner jews feed the vicious cycle by not acknowledging this sickness (out of fear) and it makes the commoner non-jews angrier. For some reason all others can face criticism all day long but not them? Vicious power game.

[–]Insider 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

how was the central banking system created in the Western world? Did they implement communism in order to create the Federal Reserve?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

Communist society also involves the absence of private property, social classes, money, and the state. Communists often seek a voluntary state of self-governance, but disagree on the means to this end.

Based on this definition of communism, how do elites and slaves exist if there are no social classes? How do states rule without a state? How do they have central banking without money?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There have been communist states, thats obviously an incorrect definition, but so is his. He is referring to 'Cultural Marxism' which ironically isn't something Marx wrote about, but seems to mean any socially authoritarian left wing government.

To have Communism you just need some arrangement that lacks markets, and public ownership of the means of production, as opposed to capitalism having a market economy with privately owned means of production.

[–]Insider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

have there been states with purely public ownership of the means of production?

It seems as if that most countries are mixed, with a few things that are publicly owned, but controlled through the government. 10 Euro countries where public ownership is completely normal: https://weownit.org.uk/blog/top-10-countries-where-public-ownership-totally-normal

But I don't hear those countries being referred to as commie states.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

have there been states with purely public ownership of the means of production?

Yes, for instance the USSR

"Private ownership of enterprises and property had essentially remained illegal throughout the Soviet era, with Soviet communism emphasizing national control over all means of production but human labor"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatization_in_Russia

Also communist China - under Mao, not the capitalists masquerading as communists in the CCP

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3024256

Also Communist Cuba

https://time.com/5937706/cuba-private-business/

If you don't have mostly complete public ownership of capital, it isn't really Communism. But anyways, these are your textbook Marxist states, and they all have this defining feature

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Western central bankers (almost all "jewish" or fake-jewish dynastic tribes) consolidated their power (wealth + aristocracy > politics, institutions) in a relatively short window of time, igniting in the 18th century. Their power grew rapidly every generation. The world was getting smaller and easier to buy through all forms of influence, stealing, cheating, lying, warring. After owning and interbreeding with the British Empire, it wasn't long before central bankers were in position to own the US via the Federal Reserve, thus all of the US's affairs, and thus every other "western" nation.

"Western" communists particularly advocate for central banking. It's not only to shore up control over everything locally but also for the same reason so-called "non communist" "capitalist" globalists do: globalist-capitalists and communists of the "western" variety are two sides of the same beast. Both are fronts of globalist-communism: elite banker ideology. The ideology is born of the same Zionist mythos which seeks power as a superior. A priority of powerful bankers is to keep power. Their many centuries of dynasty plotting is moving closer to achieving ways to permanently lord over "western" civilization, over a permanently dependent lower class, in a manner that will never face challenge/revolution (similar to China). One-world-government technocracy will be a system seemingly impossible to escape from, under an Order of chilling bureaucracies laced in positive language, in which to be entrenched from birth, into medical tyranny, to be lorded over by a hierarchy that can and will "cancel" you if you fall out of line.

Owning the wealth as in the literal concept (banking, printing, management) owns the people. Everyone is under a spell to have to conform to it for survival thanks to large bureaucracies / hierarchies running on it. "Western" "communism" is the fake revolutionary solution bankers deploy to the commoner retards, to channel the regular people's rebellious spirit, to overthrow western nations into globalism. It's like giving cattle different paths into the same ending. Most people can be bought. People who can't be bought can be silenced by people who can be bought or at least who fear losing access to the little aspects of society they're allowed to partake in should they not conform.

History lesson:

Rule or be ruled. Wealth must be owned by people whose ideologies aren't seeking to destroy you and your ideology, and that itself requires strong ideological tribalism that seeks to maintain its survival vs. the consequences of apathy.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Very informative, nice. Zionist founder Herzl was more than happy to sacrifice commoner jews, and has some choice words on the matter.

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

💯

[–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think there are any banks in communism.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are. One of the first things communists do is establish central banking.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You need to research the origin of the ADL and why it was formed. Enjoy the journey. I don't even believe in a Jewish conspiracy, but the ADL is a near-criminal organization.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You need to research the origin of the ADL and why it was formed.

Well at a glance there seems to be some controversy around some murder charge for some Jew. The ADL claims he was framed by the KKK or something. Unsurprisingly I am not able to easily find anything to refute this, and outlets seem to be reporting it as fact. You got any suggestions for material I can read to contradict this narrative?

What I do find interesting is this contradicts what I have heard many people say, but never questioned because it sounded so plausible.

Something like the Jews have the ADL because Hitler was doing propaganda to them, and the Jews are afraid that they'll get holocausted again if people do this again. This made a lot of sense, but I see the ADL predates the end of the Holocaust by more than 30 years, and it isn't actually true.

[–]Oyveygoyim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Origin of the ADL formerly the AJDL

https://files.catbox.moe/zs7d22.jpg

[–]handbananasrevenge 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

A few famous black people start talking about Jews and now the ADL decides that it is now the one true arbiter of acceptable speech.

That’s the Achilles heel for their people. They can’t let it go and then they overreact, which causes more noticing. Streisand effect.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And then, one day, for no reason at all, black people voted for that Austrian painter with a moustache.

I'm joking, but the amount of black men talking about this shit is making the ADL and their lackeys nervous, and in turn this is causing black people to notice things.

[–][deleted]  (20 children)

[deleted]

    [–]8thmonitor 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    How is it pro? Dave talked about overrepresentation of them in Hollywood and kind of mocked antisemitism.

    [–]SMCAB 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You're talking to a socks alt. It's worse than bamboo shoots under the fingernails.

    He's either a really well paid shill or a humongous fatass with nothing better to do, either way, don't feed the trolls.

    [–]BISH 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    How is it pro? Dave talked about overrepresentation of them in Hollywood and kind of mocked antisemitism.

    You're arguing with the stupidest person on Saidit.

    Schwarzenigga = Socks

    [–]Insider 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    I like how he's repping the establishment/Dem point of view, but uses racist terminology in his username.

    I guess he's showing their true colors.

    [–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I guess he's showing their true colors.

    It's great that socks was voted the stupidest person. True colors indeed.

    [–]monkeymagic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    nigga is a fairly benign term.

    [–]jet199 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I mean you should probably watch the set rather than going on what you heard.

    Pretty basic stuff.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

      yes, please do better

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

        The JQ is going mainstream mfer. Glorious times.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          There's only one JQ, it is what Marx talked about.

          [–]jet199 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

          Don't bullshit us.

          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Why?

            [–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            I can support you are covering your arse.

            No English speaker would watch a TV show and then say "that's not what I heard" when seeing it misdescribed.

            [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            pretty funny for a body clone that doesn't sound or look like the original Chappelle

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            pretty funny for a body clone that doesn't sound or look like the original Chappelle

            Yeah, I've always wondered about his change in appearance and voice, but to me it looks like he might have just taken a bunch of steroids

            [–]Datachost 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            I always think of the guy from American Pie and Zach Levy. There's surprise almost to the point of feeling like they've been underhanded in some way due to "seeming Jewish", but not actually being Jewish. And why would that matter, unless being Jewish actually is advantageous to get a leg up in Hollywood?

            There's a difference between saying "All you need is to be Jewish" and "Being Jewish certainly helps". When you reach the point of making out the latter is as bad as the former, it's just going to foster anti Semitism, since it will just lead to people going "Well why don't they want people talking about something that harmless?"

            [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            I always think of the guy from American Pie

            Jason Biggs isn't Jewish? He certainly looks it, although I guess his name isn't that Jewy sounding

            it's just going to foster anti Semitism, since it will just lead to people going "Well why don't they want people talking about something that harmless?"

            Thats the funniest thing about all this to me. All of the people they are worried are susceptible to anti-semitism - but those people are going to see the response to Kanye/Kyrie as confirming what they are saying. Furthermore, Kyrie's tweet was up for a couple hours before he deleted it, it was the weeks of news cycle coverage in response to it that drove that video that they don't want people watching to the top of the Amazon lists

            [–]wrgaerg 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            at least show the jokes ? thats all. thanks. damn my self. show up. i liked the ending.

            "whom ever they are" idk where he was goiing with the trump. beating the 'other elites' at there own lies. by his pov.

            lorne 'last name' is w/e another of your targeted jews. dman i put on black face.

            such a history. i remembmer. when my was severed. because. i couldnt be infront of a tv recording me into other people watching tv.

            hooo ray. thought i was booing my self in my sleep. scared for substance. eek. scarred, by the previous, misdirections and silly . hindsight. take care you all. vapids ventures. tepids. quiets. manniqens. shrouds. / damn the computer

            [–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)