you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I already found a lie

The first mRNA vaccines using these fatty envelopes were developed against the deadly Ebola virus, but since that virus is only found in a limited number of African countries, it had no commercial development in the U.S.

If that's true, why are there 3 approved non-mRNA ebola vaccines? One from J+J and one from Canada/Merck. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebola_vaccine

look at this non-science shit

Thanks to decades of research and innovation, mRNA vaccine technology was ready.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And one reason the mRNA version was not viable for US commercial use was perhaps because of the two other non-mRNA vaccines available.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm glad we agree that this Johns Hopkins article is full of shit and not shooting straight.