you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

subs only have to tolerate it if it's on topic and in good faith. it seems that jason got banned after an on-topic good faith argument with a mod took a turn for the worse.

if a sub really wants to keep out dissenting opinion, it needs to be clearly stated in the sub rules, like /s/incels does (rule 3)

edit: imo. this is my interpretation on the existing policy, it's not up to me.

[–]bobbobbybob 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

he went off topic really fast, actually. regaling us with tales of his sexual perversions

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He also removed /u/newguy who was just arguing a point. The strike that mod got was not just all about Jason. Look at the modlog for that sub

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

so you support the trolling of a sub by a sexual deviant?

Whatever, Magnora. JC deserved his ban, he's trash