you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FollowTheMoney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Someone said it already but these ideas/movements are manufactured to further the agenda of a global tax on industry via carbon credits. It doesn't solve the problem of pollution/deforestation, it's simply another taxation method being proposed to force oligopolic markets where only the select few corporations can pay these credit taxes. Imagine getting an allotment of carbon but you can pay your government more money to pay for monopoly credits to cover the cost of your "carbon footprint" i.e your pollution rate. It's absolute nonsense and the people that buy into it via this logic of it being a product of the oppressive patriarchy are straight up fools championing their own demise.

[–]useless_aether[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

it is more than just money. they want to control every aspect of our lives, what, how and when we consume, just about everything.. deciding who lives and dies ultimately. treating people like we don't have inherent rights. it is really about global genocide

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. The Eugenics oligarch end game.

[–]FollowTheMoney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps you're right. In a way yes, if it trickled down to individuals based on socio-economic status only get an allotment of carbon credits to buy things with. The have nots will grow greater and those people will suffer more. But then you have mobilization and people rioting over that system. I hope people wake up before that point and it seems likely things will get better but they have to get worse imo. We're in the midst of this transition imo. You have US presidential candidates challenging establishment narratives and it's okay to go after these topics unlike in the early 2000's.