all 4 comments

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[removed]

    [–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    A pretty good candidate for step one in such a "general crisis" would be the dismantling of the "general" organizations coordinating clearly global responses. The UN, WHO, etc have long since given up their role of advising and are now fully invested in control structures. Global control is a perfectly bad idea. There is no worse idea in fact. Time to out those proposing it and to tear those organizations down to the ground.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      They are shell structures, yes. But these structures provide useful venues through which the assholes from each of those countries enact incredible corruption and destruction. Getting rid of them would create an excellent symbol for the return to the ideals of individual liberty. Doing so, however, is also almost absolutely impossible in the foreseeable future. A good long-term goal, rather, to keep our priorities focused.

      [–]filbs111 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Thank goodness for proof reading.

      [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The only reason other governments would be worried is because all the governments there are controlled by the same globalist power. When the people overthrow any of the puppets the globalosts lose that country, at least temporarily.

      Viva la revolution.