you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

and at the foundations you will see that the early strains of Covid were genuinely bad news even for fit healthy people.

How did they identify these COVID strains? Insilico isolation, right?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How did they identify these COVID strains? Insilico isolation, right?

No. "In silico" is pseudo-Latin for a fancy computer simulation of a simplified model of a cell or molecule. You can't identify viruses with a computer model.

They identify the strains of Covid using the same techniques as used to identify influenza strains, or any other virus. Genomic sequencing.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They identify the strains of Covid using the same techniques as used to identify influenza strains, or any other virus. Genomic sequencing.

Source?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://www.prevention.com/health/a38580337/how-to-know-what-strain-of-covid-you-have/

If you don't think that they use genomic sequencing on viruses, what do you think they do?

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you don't think that they use genomic sequencing on viruses, what do you think they do?

I've investigated their claims of viral isolation, and it's absurd. Nothing is "isolated". It's a chemically adulterated biological soup, and they call this soup "isolation".

At no point do they have a purified substance that is sperated from the rest of the biological material.

They're using bogus chemical tests, which are functionality meaningless.