you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Everything in the wikipedia article is white washed to be as flattering and dismissive of his crimes as possible. They inaccurately claim his kiddie porn is nothing more than "kitch art". His lawyer sister works for the ACLU.

He continues to get work in hollywood. Whenever he is mentioned people claim that the only thing he got in trouble for was masturbating in a theatre.

And of course he is jewish.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You saw his stash and are certain it's not just bad artworks?

[–]Canbot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Let me guess, you're jewish.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

everyone with different opinions to my (OBVIOUSLY correct) opinion about what constitutes art, are jews

mmmmmkay

[–]Canbot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

That idiotic misrepresentation of my position is yet more evidece of your jewishness. You don't believe that, but you think it is a cleaver argument. Only people who have absolutely no moral compass or integrity actually make disingenuous arguments like that.

There is no reasonable doubt about the fact that those 70k images were child porn. That is the testimony of the police officers who did see it. The audacity to put forward such an absurd claim is a uniquely jewish trait.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

law enforcement officers never lie

LMAO