all 1 comments

[–]RandomCollection[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://archive.is/j3drm

Yeah the colleges always rig the admission process in favor of the rich. I bet it's worse than stated in this article.

The case for eliminating standardized testing on equity grounds is weak. In recent years, many have called for colleges to stop considering SAT scores when making admissions decisions on the grounds that the test is biased in favor of privileged students, who can afford to pay for tutoring. The Opportunity Insights data suggests that this is misguided, since less-transparent admissions criteria — such as the interviews, recommendations letters, personal essays, and extracurriculars that inform “nonacademic ratings” — appear to benefit the privileged even more. It is easier for a working-class kid to pick up an SAT prep book and study it intensively than it is for them to go on a community-service trip to South America, play travel lacrosse, or flatter the sensibilities of an upper-middle-class admissions official. More critically, it is easier for schools to game intangible criteria in the wealthy’s favor.

Unlike voting for the Democratic Establishment, there's an argument that test scores are an actual lesser evil here.