you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I'm not sure I'm following.

What's the woke bit?

[–]YoMamma 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Four Saiditors choke on an anti-woke post that makes a false claim about Scottish Frankenstein-style fiction that's unrelated to anything 'woke'.

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

What's the false claim? That totally happens in the movie.

The sex aspects are mildly disturbing. I think people are blowing it out of proportion but it is a notable aspect to the film.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I think it's nonsense to claim that this is a 'woke' issue. The motive for Frankenstein-esque characters is science, not socio-political pre-election false narratives. The father is a sicko, not a social justice moron.

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I thought you saw it, see my other comment in this thread. Things don't go down exactly as people are imagining. The creator doesn't want the woman-child having sex.

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I saw it earlier and upvoted it

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I thought you saw the movie I meant.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I saw the movie.

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Did you like it? It's the best movie I've seen in a few years, although I like artsy films.