you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]no_u 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

But you first tell me that you don't understand the 'point' and now you tell me that he didn't make a 'point', and yet your post says he's not right about the 'point'. Dude, you're either not trying to understand the post or you don't want to, and in either case, you can't make an argument about it and back up that argument. He makes an excellent point about the hypocrisy of the right wing assholes who've helped cause school shootings that are almost unique to the US - all because of brainwashing voters to think they need immediate access to assault weapons for absolutely everyone - and yet they cry like babies about drag queens who are offering readings, as if that's destroying society. Meanwhile, numerous children have lifetime PTSD because of the NRA and right wing, not to mention the many innocents who've died. Dems also take NRA money, and AIPAC money, but the topic is - wtf should anyone care about any drag queens? That's totally right wing propaganda. Parents can determine what to do with their kids. End of story.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I shall repeat myself then.

Could you reiterate that point to me, so that I might understand it?

Explain it to me. As though I were a child, if you have to.

As, he made no point. He changed the topic.

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've explained it. Re-read my response? He was of course on topic, and this is more obvious in the original interview.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. You've """"expleened it"""".

He changed the topic, thus declaring himself the """winner""".