use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
Saidit home of r/WatchRedditDie. Reddit censorship related stuff is welcome here.
Mod on r/WatchRedditDie and want to get approved here? Send me a PM.
Trans Reddit User Posted Hundreds of Pornographic Drawings of Child Characters Under 10, Mods Banned Anyone Who Criticized Them
submitted 3 years ago by scrubking from thegatewaypundit.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Reed_Solomon 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
I don't think drawings should be illegal, but at the same time it's pretty sickening and disgusting that this was allowed on their platform.
[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
All child porn increases offending whether it's real or created.
[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
I dont think porn leads to rape. I think we have a huge problem because we don't distinguish kiddie porn from raping kids. This gives the (((medi))) enough leeway to minimize the crimes of child rapists by simply reporting that they are pedophiles and claiming their charges are for kiddie porn. And it gives people a false sense that child rape is being stopped by the FBI because once in a while they bust a child porn ring where it's just a bunch of pedos trading porn they found on line.
Naturally child porn should be illegal because it CAN be used to coerce children into sexual acts. But we should not elevate it to the same status as molestation or rape by claiming that it always leads to it. That causes harm and you absolutely dont need that claim in order to make it illegal.
[–]akkordeonplayer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
Partaking in viewing and distributing it is a sexual offense against a child in itself.
[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
It is not. This is irrational emotional bullshit at best. And strategic propaganda designed to create exploitable confusion at worst.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Reed_Solomon 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]akkordeonplayer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)