use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
RESOURCES and TOOLS
Small wars journal https://smallwarsjournal.com/index.php/
Institute for the study of war http://www.understandingwar.org/publications
The CIA world factbook https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html
US geospatial intelligence foundation https://usgif.org/
The true crisis of Zionism: silent majority of US Jews have never supported it
submitted 5 years ago by magnora7 from mondoweiss.net
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (7 children)
Well, we're all humans, and we're all tacitly supporting every misdoing of the human race by not speaking out against it. So we're all to blame, in that sense.
Every US and Israeli taxpayer is also directly tacitly supporting this, are they not?
But this article is about people saying they disagree with it, so let's not blame those people right now. Because they literally are speaking out against it, or else the poll wouldn't have had the result it did.
[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (6 children)
we're all tacitly supporting every misdoing of the human race by not speaking out against it
Here's a progressive solution to that problem: end the human race
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun - 5 years ago (5 children)
Sawboss isn't human. He's a Russian bot cyborg from the future, and he's here to usher in Armageddon. He's a cyborg usher.
[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (4 children)
No. My solution is perfectly in keeping with progressive thought.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (3 children)
Are you suggesting that malthusian philosophy is progressive?
[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
I'm suggesting that the implicit goal of "progressives" is the destruction of all humanity beginning with America. After all, that's the only way to have a truly just world.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (1 child)
In your opinion: Does the political term progressive have the same meaning in today's politics, as progressivism originally did in the 1890's?
Where do you see productive political activity occurring today?
[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
No.
Not in progressive circles, where the entire goal is to destroy.
Not in conservative circles, where resistance to change amounts to no productive activity, aside from the usual.
Not in libertarian circles, because they're not yet able to break power of fascism. Maybe some day, though the potential destructive effects of anarchy are quite worrisome.
Fascism is where all the money and power is concentrated now, and has been since (my guess) the early 20th century. It seeks increased concentration of wealth and power, and to that end might be called "productive".
No matter how I look at it, the way we currently do politics can not be "productive". Until people wake up to the true paradigm there's not much hope for anything but destruction. At best we can seek to limit the harm by constraining the fascism.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - (7 children)
[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (6 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun - (5 children)
[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)