you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]slavdude0 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Soon they'll be alone in barracks. Armies always had a problem with rape and now you're putting obvious freaks with real women.

[–]cephyrious 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Trans women" are like 10x more likely than men to commit sexual crime and 100x more likely than women or something like that. I forgot the exact stats but it was WILDLY high.

[–]westway9 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Women don't belong in the barracks, anyway. Never did.

[–]Saiditaccount1 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree women aren't cut out to perform in positions of strength.

But there could be certain areas of the army where they are useful, no?

[–]westway9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure. Just have appropriate requirements for given positions. If you can't pass basic training, you don't get a gun. If you're emotionally intelligent, you might quality for psyops. Gender need not enter into it. You know, like America was supposed to be.